What is the purpose/function of “.ßßß” files?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP


.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;







up vote
124
down vote

favorite
14












While trying to copy the contents of a 16GB usb drive, I got a warning that there was not enough free space. Checking the properties of the folder tree on the usb drive, I found a large number of ".ßßß" files that claim to be around 3.5GB each, for a total of approximately 908GB (which I don't think could be possible on a 16GB drive).



screenshot of the files in question



Obviously there is something going on here, but I cannot find any reference to this file type online.



When I try to delete these files, they request administrator permission (which I provide). However, they then throw a "File Access Denied" error and state that I require permission from the adminsitrator...



Does anyone know what the purpose of these files are, and how to remove them?







share|improve this question

















  • 10




    This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
    – confetti
    Aug 1 at 18:04







  • 40




    I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Aug 1 at 18:07






  • 2




    @Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
    – Run5k
    Aug 1 at 18:11







  • 2




    That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
    – bwDraco
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
    – JIV
    2 days ago
















up vote
124
down vote

favorite
14












While trying to copy the contents of a 16GB usb drive, I got a warning that there was not enough free space. Checking the properties of the folder tree on the usb drive, I found a large number of ".ßßß" files that claim to be around 3.5GB each, for a total of approximately 908GB (which I don't think could be possible on a 16GB drive).



screenshot of the files in question



Obviously there is something going on here, but I cannot find any reference to this file type online.



When I try to delete these files, they request administrator permission (which I provide). However, they then throw a "File Access Denied" error and state that I require permission from the adminsitrator...



Does anyone know what the purpose of these files are, and how to remove them?







share|improve this question

















  • 10




    This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
    – confetti
    Aug 1 at 18:04







  • 40




    I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Aug 1 at 18:07






  • 2




    @Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
    – Run5k
    Aug 1 at 18:11







  • 2




    That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
    – bwDraco
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
    – JIV
    2 days ago












up vote
124
down vote

favorite
14









up vote
124
down vote

favorite
14






14





While trying to copy the contents of a 16GB usb drive, I got a warning that there was not enough free space. Checking the properties of the folder tree on the usb drive, I found a large number of ".ßßß" files that claim to be around 3.5GB each, for a total of approximately 908GB (which I don't think could be possible on a 16GB drive).



screenshot of the files in question



Obviously there is something going on here, but I cannot find any reference to this file type online.



When I try to delete these files, they request administrator permission (which I provide). However, they then throw a "File Access Denied" error and state that I require permission from the adminsitrator...



Does anyone know what the purpose of these files are, and how to remove them?







share|improve this question













While trying to copy the contents of a 16GB usb drive, I got a warning that there was not enough free space. Checking the properties of the folder tree on the usb drive, I found a large number of ".ßßß" files that claim to be around 3.5GB each, for a total of approximately 908GB (which I don't think could be possible on a 16GB drive).



screenshot of the files in question



Obviously there is something going on here, but I cannot find any reference to this file type online.



When I try to delete these files, they request administrator permission (which I provide). However, they then throw a "File Access Denied" error and state that I require permission from the adminsitrator...



Does anyone know what the purpose of these files are, and how to remove them?









share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Konrad Rudolph

3,82562033




3,82562033









asked Aug 1 at 17:58









Arne

580129




580129







  • 10




    This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
    – confetti
    Aug 1 at 18:04







  • 40




    I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Aug 1 at 18:07






  • 2




    @Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
    – Run5k
    Aug 1 at 18:11







  • 2




    That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
    – bwDraco
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
    – JIV
    2 days ago












  • 10




    This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
    – confetti
    Aug 1 at 18:04







  • 40




    I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Aug 1 at 18:07






  • 2




    @Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
    – Run5k
    Aug 1 at 18:11







  • 2




    That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
    – bwDraco
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
    – JIV
    2 days ago







10




10




This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
– confetti
Aug 1 at 18:04





This looks like malware, possibly using USB spreading technologies or obfuscation of file content/names to destroy data. It's definitely nothing normal or expected. The filesize also only appears to be this big.
– confetti
Aug 1 at 18:04





40




40




I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
– Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Aug 1 at 18:07




I think your drive, or at least the filesystem on it, might be toast.
– Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Aug 1 at 18:07




2




2




@Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
– Run5k
Aug 1 at 18:11





@Arne you need a minimum of 10 reputation to actually insert the picture within your question, but not to upload it and provide us with a hyperlink. After that, one of us with enough rep would be glad to convert the hyperlink into an inline picture. However, some will be hesitant to navigate to an unknown domain to do the same thing.
– Run5k
Aug 1 at 18:11





2




2




That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
– bwDraco
2 days ago




That... looks like FS corruption. Try running chkdsk or Repair-Volume on the drive?
– bwDraco
2 days ago




1




1




Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
– JIV
2 days ago




Is this drive from China? They used to change FW to report bigger size than real. If end was reached, writing begin on start, thus overriding FS.
– JIV
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
330
down vote



accepted










Most likely these aren't actual files but the result of filesystem corruption.



  • It is normally not possible to have multiple identically named files.

  • Their names (ßßßßßßßß.ßßß) correspond to hexadecimal bytes E1 E1 E1… in code page 437 (which was the default MS-DOS code page, and therefore the default FAT/FAT32 code page when long file names aren't in use).
    (The character is not the Greek beta but the German lowercase sharp S. The dot isn't actually stored in the FAT, but added by the OS when reading, so it doesn't get corrupted.)

  • Their sizes are close to 3 789 677 025 bytes, which is again 0xE1 E1 E1 E1 in hex.
    (That's approximately 3 700 856.469 kilobytes; Windows probably rounds up.)

All signs point to part of your filesystem's master file table being filled with the byte 0xE1, which may be caused by software (such as unplugging mid-write), but may also indicate that the flash memory itself is dying.



Software-induced corruption can often be cleaned up by using Windows' disk error checking (chkdsk). Or just reformat the drive (after copying your real files out of it).



But especially for cheaper and/or heavily-used drives, bad flash memory is very likely. Don't use this drive for important files anymore.






share|improve this answer



















  • 21




    Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
    – Arne
    Aug 1 at 18:27










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1345305%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-function-of-%25c3%259f%25c3%259f%25c3%259f-files%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
330
down vote



accepted










Most likely these aren't actual files but the result of filesystem corruption.



  • It is normally not possible to have multiple identically named files.

  • Their names (ßßßßßßßß.ßßß) correspond to hexadecimal bytes E1 E1 E1… in code page 437 (which was the default MS-DOS code page, and therefore the default FAT/FAT32 code page when long file names aren't in use).
    (The character is not the Greek beta but the German lowercase sharp S. The dot isn't actually stored in the FAT, but added by the OS when reading, so it doesn't get corrupted.)

  • Their sizes are close to 3 789 677 025 bytes, which is again 0xE1 E1 E1 E1 in hex.
    (That's approximately 3 700 856.469 kilobytes; Windows probably rounds up.)

All signs point to part of your filesystem's master file table being filled with the byte 0xE1, which may be caused by software (such as unplugging mid-write), but may also indicate that the flash memory itself is dying.



Software-induced corruption can often be cleaned up by using Windows' disk error checking (chkdsk). Or just reformat the drive (after copying your real files out of it).



But especially for cheaper and/or heavily-used drives, bad flash memory is very likely. Don't use this drive for important files anymore.






share|improve this answer



















  • 21




    Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
    – Arne
    Aug 1 at 18:27














up vote
330
down vote



accepted










Most likely these aren't actual files but the result of filesystem corruption.



  • It is normally not possible to have multiple identically named files.

  • Their names (ßßßßßßßß.ßßß) correspond to hexadecimal bytes E1 E1 E1… in code page 437 (which was the default MS-DOS code page, and therefore the default FAT/FAT32 code page when long file names aren't in use).
    (The character is not the Greek beta but the German lowercase sharp S. The dot isn't actually stored in the FAT, but added by the OS when reading, so it doesn't get corrupted.)

  • Their sizes are close to 3 789 677 025 bytes, which is again 0xE1 E1 E1 E1 in hex.
    (That's approximately 3 700 856.469 kilobytes; Windows probably rounds up.)

All signs point to part of your filesystem's master file table being filled with the byte 0xE1, which may be caused by software (such as unplugging mid-write), but may also indicate that the flash memory itself is dying.



Software-induced corruption can often be cleaned up by using Windows' disk error checking (chkdsk). Or just reformat the drive (after copying your real files out of it).



But especially for cheaper and/or heavily-used drives, bad flash memory is very likely. Don't use this drive for important files anymore.






share|improve this answer



















  • 21




    Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
    – Arne
    Aug 1 at 18:27












up vote
330
down vote



accepted







up vote
330
down vote



accepted






Most likely these aren't actual files but the result of filesystem corruption.



  • It is normally not possible to have multiple identically named files.

  • Their names (ßßßßßßßß.ßßß) correspond to hexadecimal bytes E1 E1 E1… in code page 437 (which was the default MS-DOS code page, and therefore the default FAT/FAT32 code page when long file names aren't in use).
    (The character is not the Greek beta but the German lowercase sharp S. The dot isn't actually stored in the FAT, but added by the OS when reading, so it doesn't get corrupted.)

  • Their sizes are close to 3 789 677 025 bytes, which is again 0xE1 E1 E1 E1 in hex.
    (That's approximately 3 700 856.469 kilobytes; Windows probably rounds up.)

All signs point to part of your filesystem's master file table being filled with the byte 0xE1, which may be caused by software (such as unplugging mid-write), but may also indicate that the flash memory itself is dying.



Software-induced corruption can often be cleaned up by using Windows' disk error checking (chkdsk). Or just reformat the drive (after copying your real files out of it).



But especially for cheaper and/or heavily-used drives, bad flash memory is very likely. Don't use this drive for important files anymore.






share|improve this answer















Most likely these aren't actual files but the result of filesystem corruption.



  • It is normally not possible to have multiple identically named files.

  • Their names (ßßßßßßßß.ßßß) correspond to hexadecimal bytes E1 E1 E1… in code page 437 (which was the default MS-DOS code page, and therefore the default FAT/FAT32 code page when long file names aren't in use).
    (The character is not the Greek beta but the German lowercase sharp S. The dot isn't actually stored in the FAT, but added by the OS when reading, so it doesn't get corrupted.)

  • Their sizes are close to 3 789 677 025 bytes, which is again 0xE1 E1 E1 E1 in hex.
    (That's approximately 3 700 856.469 kilobytes; Windows probably rounds up.)

All signs point to part of your filesystem's master file table being filled with the byte 0xE1, which may be caused by software (such as unplugging mid-write), but may also indicate that the flash memory itself is dying.



Software-induced corruption can often be cleaned up by using Windows' disk error checking (chkdsk). Or just reformat the drive (after copying your real files out of it).



But especially for cheaper and/or heavily-used drives, bad flash memory is very likely. Don't use this drive for important files anymore.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago


























answered Aug 1 at 18:12









grawity

211k31429495




211k31429495







  • 21




    Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
    – Arne
    Aug 1 at 18:27












  • 21




    Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
    – Arne
    Aug 1 at 18:27







21




21




Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
– Arne
Aug 1 at 18:27




Your theory seems solid, based on the recurring theme of the E1 byte. I've since formatted the drive and all appears well... but I will likely not be using this drive for mission-critical purposes anymore. Thanks for the insight!
– Arne
Aug 1 at 18:27












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1345305%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-function-of-%25c3%259f%25c3%259f%25c3%259f-files%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

pylint3 and pip3 broken

Missing snmpget and snmpwalk

How to enroll fingerprints to Ubuntu 17.10 with VFS491