Build failed mainline
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO9GURib1T8z7lCwjOGLQaGtrueEthgQ8LO42ZX8cOfTqDK4jvDDpKkLFwf2J49kYCMNW7d4ABih_XCb_2UXdq5fPJDkoyg7-8g_YfRUot-XnaXkNYycsNp7lA5_TW9td0FFpLQ2APzKcZ/s1600/1.jpg)
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite Was waiting eagerly for Linux 4.17-rc2. It was late. Turns out build failed for some archs. http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.17-rc2/ But also, the ones that succeeded (such as amd64) are unsigned. They are also anaemic at about 7MB compared to over 50MB for normal generic images from the mainline. Why are they unsigned, and why are they so small, just because builds for other architectures failed? Thank you for any information! kernel compiling share | improve this question asked Apr 23 at 10:24 Karatekid430 6 1 Turns out since then, some deb files appeared with modules - they must be separating them from the image file. â Karatekid430 Apr 23 at 14:46 Still does not explain why they are unsigned. I cannot be bothered disabling Secure Boot and then have Windows have a hissy fit and dump the TPM, demanding the recovery key. He...