Make a Geiger Counter
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO9GURib1T8z7lCwjOGLQaGtrueEthgQ8LO42ZX8cOfTqDK4jvDDpKkLFwf2J49kYCMNW7d4ABih_XCb_2UXdq5fPJDkoyg7-8g_YfRUot-XnaXkNYycsNp7lA5_TW9td0FFpLQ2APzKcZ/s1600/1.jpg)
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYQ0N5W1qAOxLP7t7iOM6O6AzbZnkXUy16s7P_CWfOb5UbTQY_aDsc727chyphenhyphen5W4IppVNernMMQeaUFTB_rFzAd95_CDt-tnwN-nBx6JyUp2duGjPaL5-VgNO41AVsA_vu30EJcipdDG409/s400/Clash+Royale+CLAN+TAG%2523URR8PPP.png)
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
A Geiger counter is a device that is used to detect radiation.
We will be making a Geiger counter program.
As we all know, when radiation hits a computer program it removes exactly 1 byte at random. So a Geiger counter program is a program that itself does nothing, but when any byte is removed the modified program prints beep
, to indicate the presence of radiation.
Answers will be scored in bytes with fewer bytes being better. Answers must be at least 1 byte.
Your program may print beep
with trailing a newline or print a single newline for empty output, so long as it does so consistently. Your program may also use a different case for beep
such as BEEP
, bEEP
, or Beep
so long as it does so consistently.
code-golf radiation-hardening
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
A Geiger counter is a device that is used to detect radiation.
We will be making a Geiger counter program.
As we all know, when radiation hits a computer program it removes exactly 1 byte at random. So a Geiger counter program is a program that itself does nothing, but when any byte is removed the modified program prints beep
, to indicate the presence of radiation.
Answers will be scored in bytes with fewer bytes being better. Answers must be at least 1 byte.
Your program may print beep
with trailing a newline or print a single newline for empty output, so long as it does so consistently. Your program may also use a different case for beep
such as BEEP
, bEEP
, or Beep
so long as it does so consistently.
code-golf radiation-hardening
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Can we change the case ofbeep
. For example, isBEEP
okay?
â Jo King
12 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
A Geiger counter is a device that is used to detect radiation.
We will be making a Geiger counter program.
As we all know, when radiation hits a computer program it removes exactly 1 byte at random. So a Geiger counter program is a program that itself does nothing, but when any byte is removed the modified program prints beep
, to indicate the presence of radiation.
Answers will be scored in bytes with fewer bytes being better. Answers must be at least 1 byte.
Your program may print beep
with trailing a newline or print a single newline for empty output, so long as it does so consistently. Your program may also use a different case for beep
such as BEEP
, bEEP
, or Beep
so long as it does so consistently.
code-golf radiation-hardening
A Geiger counter is a device that is used to detect radiation.
We will be making a Geiger counter program.
As we all know, when radiation hits a computer program it removes exactly 1 byte at random. So a Geiger counter program is a program that itself does nothing, but when any byte is removed the modified program prints beep
, to indicate the presence of radiation.
Answers will be scored in bytes with fewer bytes being better. Answers must be at least 1 byte.
Your program may print beep
with trailing a newline or print a single newline for empty output, so long as it does so consistently. Your program may also use a different case for beep
such as BEEP
, bEEP
, or Beep
so long as it does so consistently.
code-golf radiation-hardening
edited 6 hours ago
asked 20 hours ago
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/LLrlX.jpg?s=32&g=1)
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/LLrlX.jpg?s=32&g=1)
W W
34.3k10142337
34.3k10142337
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Can we change the case ofbeep
. For example, isBEEP
okay?
â Jo King
12 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago
add a comment |Â
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Can we change the case ofbeep
. For example, isBEEP
okay?
â Jo King
12 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Can we change the case of
beep
. For example, is BEEP
okay?â Jo King
12 hours ago
Can we change the case of
beep
. For example, is BEEP
okay?â Jo King
12 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
9
down vote
Hexagony, 38 bytes
.....;p;<>b;e;/<b;e;;p...@@.......;@..
Try it online!
Verification program.
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Lost, 303 293 263 253 238 bytes
v^^"peeb"</"beepvv"((>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[
>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Try it online!
Verification script (borrowed from user 202729's answer). Unfortunately this can only test half of the code at a time, but rest assured I've tested the whole program.
Ouch, this was a tough one. I'll quote WW's deleted answer:
Lost is perhaps the most interesting language for this challenge. In
Lost the start location and direction of the pointer is entirely
random, thus to make deterministic programs you must account for every
possible start location and direction. At the same time, by the nature
of this challenge you must also account for any single byte being
removed.
Unfortunately, his answer didn't take into account removing newlines, which screwed everything up.
Explanation:
(note that a few bytes might be off here and there)
First let's talk about the general structure of the code:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[ Processing line
>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Beep line
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up beep line
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up return line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return line
Everything but the processing line must be entirely composed of either >
or one of /
. Why? Well, as an example, let's remove a newline:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The first line is now way longer than the rest of the block. If a pointer were to spawn on a non->/
character with vertical movement, then it would get stuck in an infinite loop.
The biggest radiation detector part is the section at the end of each line.
\
>\
>>\
>>>
Normally an IP passing through this from the first line would exit out the last line. However, if any character on the line is removed, then that line shifts down one, e.g:
\
>\
>\
>>>
And the IP instead exits out the line that is missing a byte (with the exception of the last line, where it exits out the second to last).
From there, each of the first four lines will redirect to the second line:
v
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>//
>//
Which will then lead into either one of the two beep
ers.
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
If any of the bytes in the first beep
er have been removed, then it instead goes to the second:
v^^"peb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
Both beep
ers then lead back to the first line and the terminating @
.
Some other miscellaneous parts:
The (((((([[[[[[[
is used to clear the stack when the pointer starts inside a pair of quotes and ends up pushing the whole first line to stack. It has to be so unfortunately long because the first newline can be removed to make the first line twice the size. Experimenting in generating the beep
using arithmetic instead of quotes ended up longer.
The s and
/
s scattered across the lines are there to golf bytes in the top line of code by redirecting
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
9
down vote
Hexagony, 38 bytes
.....;p;<>b;e;/<b;e;;p...@@.......;@..
Try it online!
Verification program.
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Hexagony, 38 bytes
.....;p;<>b;e;/<b;e;;p...@@.......;@..
Try it online!
Verification program.
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Hexagony, 38 bytes
.....;p;<>b;e;/<b;e;;p...@@.......;@..
Try it online!
Verification program.
Hexagony, 38 bytes
.....;p;<>b;e;/<b;e;;p...@@.......;@..
Try it online!
Verification program.
edited 17 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
user202729
11.9k12246
11.9k12246
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Lost, 303 293 263 253 238 bytes
v^^"peeb"</"beepvv"((>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[
>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Try it online!
Verification script (borrowed from user 202729's answer). Unfortunately this can only test half of the code at a time, but rest assured I've tested the whole program.
Ouch, this was a tough one. I'll quote WW's deleted answer:
Lost is perhaps the most interesting language for this challenge. In
Lost the start location and direction of the pointer is entirely
random, thus to make deterministic programs you must account for every
possible start location and direction. At the same time, by the nature
of this challenge you must also account for any single byte being
removed.
Unfortunately, his answer didn't take into account removing newlines, which screwed everything up.
Explanation:
(note that a few bytes might be off here and there)
First let's talk about the general structure of the code:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[ Processing line
>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Beep line
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up beep line
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up return line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return line
Everything but the processing line must be entirely composed of either >
or one of /
. Why? Well, as an example, let's remove a newline:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The first line is now way longer than the rest of the block. If a pointer were to spawn on a non->/
character with vertical movement, then it would get stuck in an infinite loop.
The biggest radiation detector part is the section at the end of each line.
\
>\
>>\
>>>
Normally an IP passing through this from the first line would exit out the last line. However, if any character on the line is removed, then that line shifts down one, e.g:
\
>\
>\
>>>
And the IP instead exits out the line that is missing a byte (with the exception of the last line, where it exits out the second to last).
From there, each of the first four lines will redirect to the second line:
v
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>//
>//
Which will then lead into either one of the two beep
ers.
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
If any of the bytes in the first beep
er have been removed, then it instead goes to the second:
v^^"peb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
Both beep
ers then lead back to the first line and the terminating @
.
Some other miscellaneous parts:
The (((((([[[[[[[
is used to clear the stack when the pointer starts inside a pair of quotes and ends up pushing the whole first line to stack. It has to be so unfortunately long because the first newline can be removed to make the first line twice the size. Experimenting in generating the beep
using arithmetic instead of quotes ended up longer.
The s and
/
s scattered across the lines are there to golf bytes in the top line of code by redirecting
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
Lost, 303 293 263 253 238 bytes
v^^"peeb"</"beepvv"((>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[
>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Try it online!
Verification script (borrowed from user 202729's answer). Unfortunately this can only test half of the code at a time, but rest assured I've tested the whole program.
Ouch, this was a tough one. I'll quote WW's deleted answer:
Lost is perhaps the most interesting language for this challenge. In
Lost the start location and direction of the pointer is entirely
random, thus to make deterministic programs you must account for every
possible start location and direction. At the same time, by the nature
of this challenge you must also account for any single byte being
removed.
Unfortunately, his answer didn't take into account removing newlines, which screwed everything up.
Explanation:
(note that a few bytes might be off here and there)
First let's talk about the general structure of the code:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[ Processing line
>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Beep line
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up beep line
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up return line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return line
Everything but the processing line must be entirely composed of either >
or one of /
. Why? Well, as an example, let's remove a newline:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The first line is now way longer than the rest of the block. If a pointer were to spawn on a non->/
character with vertical movement, then it would get stuck in an infinite loop.
The biggest radiation detector part is the section at the end of each line.
\
>\
>>\
>>>
Normally an IP passing through this from the first line would exit out the last line. However, if any character on the line is removed, then that line shifts down one, e.g:
\
>\
>\
>>>
And the IP instead exits out the line that is missing a byte (with the exception of the last line, where it exits out the second to last).
From there, each of the first four lines will redirect to the second line:
v
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>//
>//
Which will then lead into either one of the two beep
ers.
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
If any of the bytes in the first beep
er have been removed, then it instead goes to the second:
v^^"peb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
Both beep
ers then lead back to the first line and the terminating @
.
Some other miscellaneous parts:
The (((((([[[[[[[
is used to clear the stack when the pointer starts inside a pair of quotes and ends up pushing the whole first line to stack. It has to be so unfortunately long because the first newline can be removed to make the first line twice the size. Experimenting in generating the beep
using arithmetic instead of quotes ended up longer.
The s and
/
s scattered across the lines are there to golf bytes in the top line of code by redirecting
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Lost, 303 293 263 253 238 bytes
v^^"peeb"</"beepvv"((>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[
>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Try it online!
Verification script (borrowed from user 202729's answer). Unfortunately this can only test half of the code at a time, but rest assured I've tested the whole program.
Ouch, this was a tough one. I'll quote WW's deleted answer:
Lost is perhaps the most interesting language for this challenge. In
Lost the start location and direction of the pointer is entirely
random, thus to make deterministic programs you must account for every
possible start location and direction. At the same time, by the nature
of this challenge you must also account for any single byte being
removed.
Unfortunately, his answer didn't take into account removing newlines, which screwed everything up.
Explanation:
(note that a few bytes might be off here and there)
First let's talk about the general structure of the code:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[ Processing line
>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Beep line
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up beep line
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up return line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return line
Everything but the processing line must be entirely composed of either >
or one of /
. Why? Well, as an example, let's remove a newline:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The first line is now way longer than the rest of the block. If a pointer were to spawn on a non->/
character with vertical movement, then it would get stuck in an infinite loop.
The biggest radiation detector part is the section at the end of each line.
\
>\
>>\
>>>
Normally an IP passing through this from the first line would exit out the last line. However, if any character on the line is removed, then that line shifts down one, e.g:
\
>\
>\
>>>
And the IP instead exits out the line that is missing a byte (with the exception of the last line, where it exits out the second to last).
From there, each of the first four lines will redirect to the second line:
v
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>//
>//
Which will then lead into either one of the two beep
ers.
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
If any of the bytes in the first beep
er have been removed, then it instead goes to the second:
v^^"peb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
Both beep
ers then lead back to the first line and the terminating @
.
Some other miscellaneous parts:
The (((((([[[[[[[
is used to clear the stack when the pointer starts inside a pair of quotes and ends up pushing the whole first line to stack. It has to be so unfortunately long because the first newline can be removed to make the first line twice the size. Experimenting in generating the beep
using arithmetic instead of quotes ended up longer.
The s and
/
s scattered across the lines are there to golf bytes in the top line of code by redirecting
Lost, 303 293 263 253 238 bytes
v^^"peeb"</"beepvv"((>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[
>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Try it online!
Verification script (borrowed from user 202729's answer). Unfortunately this can only test half of the code at a time, but rest assured I've tested the whole program.
Ouch, this was a tough one. I'll quote WW's deleted answer:
Lost is perhaps the most interesting language for this challenge. In
Lost the start location and direction of the pointer is entirely
random, thus to make deterministic programs you must account for every
possible start location and direction. At the same time, by the nature
of this challenge you must also account for any single byte being
removed.
Unfortunately, his answer didn't take into account removing newlines, which screwed everything up.
Explanation:
(note that a few bytes might be off here and there)
First let's talk about the general structure of the code:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[ Processing line
>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Beep line
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up beep line
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\ Back-up return line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Return line
Everything but the processing line must be entirely composed of either >
or one of /
. Why? Well, as an example, let's remove a newline:
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>>>@@>>%%>>(((((([[[[[[[>>>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>//>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The first line is now way longer than the rest of the block. If a pointer were to spawn on a non->/
character with vertical movement, then it would get stuck in an infinite loop.
The biggest radiation detector part is the section at the end of each line.
\
>\
>>\
>>>
Normally an IP passing through this from the first line would exit out the last line. However, if any character on the line is removed, then that line shifts down one, e.g:
\
>\
>\
>>>
And the IP instead exits out the line that is missing a byte (with the exception of the last line, where it exits out the second to last).
From there, each of the first four lines will redirect to the second line:
v
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>//
>//
Which will then lead into either one of the two beep
ers.
v^^"peeb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
If any of the bytes in the first beep
er have been removed, then it instead goes to the second:
v^^"peb"<</"beepvv"((>
>>>>>>>>>>>//
Both beep
ers then lead back to the first line and the terminating @
.
Some other miscellaneous parts:
The (((((([[[[[[[
is used to clear the stack when the pointer starts inside a pair of quotes and ends up pushing the whole first line to stack. It has to be so unfortunately long because the first newline can be removed to make the first line twice the size. Experimenting in generating the beep
using arithmetic instead of quotes ended up longer.
The s and
/
s scattered across the lines are there to golf bytes in the top line of code by redirecting
edited 11 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Jo King
11.4k13671
11.4k13671
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f169960%2fmake-a-geiger-counter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Related, Related.
â W W
20 hours ago
Can we change the case of
beep
. For example, isBEEP
okay?â Jo King
12 hours ago
*Geiger-Muller Tube connected to a counter ;)
â Beta Decay
11 hours ago
@JoKing Sure, that's ok too.
â W W
6 hours ago