I travel back in time: how could I know when I landed?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP








up vote
40
down vote

favorite
3












Today a weird guy with a pointy hat offered me and my friends to play a game: We will all travel back in time, to a random date somewhen from the antiquity to modern times. We will have a limited amount of time to do whatever we want before returning to our current world. After that time, each of us tries to guess the date we travelled to and the winner is the one who comes closest to the real date they travelled to.



Details:



  • It's not time travel per se, but more a kind of simulation, so interaction in the past won't have impact on the present.

  • We will all travel to the same time period, but we will not be able to interact with each other.

  • We will stay more or less in the same area, i.e. western Europe. Sometimes in the middle of a forest, sometimes inside a city, but always western Europe.

  • Each of us are fluent in French, and know some basics of English, Spanish and German. Local people will speak the language that was spoken during their time period in their specific region.

  • We are not historians, and even subjects to some TV-tropes and other cliches.

  • We can't bring any device with us, like a computer or astronomical tools.

  • The amount of time before we come back to the current time period is unknown to us, but always between 5 minutes and 5 days. Ideally, I would like a method to do a rough estimation, and narrow it more and more untill I came back to modern times.

  • If you die in the simulation, you go back to the present. Being killed have no impact on current time, but is still good to avoid as you can feel pain and you will have less time than others to estimate on what period you landed

  • We have no time to prepare ourself: the wizard just give us few minutes so we can decide if we want to play, but no time to learn greek or do a PHD in history. I can do a quick google research like translate a phrase in latin, but nothing that take more than a minute.

  • Estimation such as "X year of reign of dude Y" are accepted if it's the contemporary way to count years

  • You have to answer immediately after you get back

This might be seen as a duplicate of the question My time machine needs to know when it is at first, but that question focuses on tools and science (astronomy, carbon dating...) to have an exact dating, while my question focuses on estimation using no tools, interacting with local folks, trying to evaluate technological advance, studying architecture...



How could I know when I landed?







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
    – AlexP
    yesterday







  • 12




    This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
    – Swier
    yesterday






  • 2




    Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
    – gerrit
    yesterday






  • 5




    Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
    – Drag and Drop
    yesterday







  • 1




    @Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
    – Alexander
    yesterday














up vote
40
down vote

favorite
3












Today a weird guy with a pointy hat offered me and my friends to play a game: We will all travel back in time, to a random date somewhen from the antiquity to modern times. We will have a limited amount of time to do whatever we want before returning to our current world. After that time, each of us tries to guess the date we travelled to and the winner is the one who comes closest to the real date they travelled to.



Details:



  • It's not time travel per se, but more a kind of simulation, so interaction in the past won't have impact on the present.

  • We will all travel to the same time period, but we will not be able to interact with each other.

  • We will stay more or less in the same area, i.e. western Europe. Sometimes in the middle of a forest, sometimes inside a city, but always western Europe.

  • Each of us are fluent in French, and know some basics of English, Spanish and German. Local people will speak the language that was spoken during their time period in their specific region.

  • We are not historians, and even subjects to some TV-tropes and other cliches.

  • We can't bring any device with us, like a computer or astronomical tools.

  • The amount of time before we come back to the current time period is unknown to us, but always between 5 minutes and 5 days. Ideally, I would like a method to do a rough estimation, and narrow it more and more untill I came back to modern times.

  • If you die in the simulation, you go back to the present. Being killed have no impact on current time, but is still good to avoid as you can feel pain and you will have less time than others to estimate on what period you landed

  • We have no time to prepare ourself: the wizard just give us few minutes so we can decide if we want to play, but no time to learn greek or do a PHD in history. I can do a quick google research like translate a phrase in latin, but nothing that take more than a minute.

  • Estimation such as "X year of reign of dude Y" are accepted if it's the contemporary way to count years

  • You have to answer immediately after you get back

This might be seen as a duplicate of the question My time machine needs to know when it is at first, but that question focuses on tools and science (astronomy, carbon dating...) to have an exact dating, while my question focuses on estimation using no tools, interacting with local folks, trying to evaluate technological advance, studying architecture...



How could I know when I landed?







share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
    – AlexP
    yesterday







  • 12




    This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
    – Swier
    yesterday






  • 2




    Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
    – gerrit
    yesterday






  • 5




    Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
    – Drag and Drop
    yesterday







  • 1




    @Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
    – Alexander
    yesterday












up vote
40
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
40
down vote

favorite
3






3





Today a weird guy with a pointy hat offered me and my friends to play a game: We will all travel back in time, to a random date somewhen from the antiquity to modern times. We will have a limited amount of time to do whatever we want before returning to our current world. After that time, each of us tries to guess the date we travelled to and the winner is the one who comes closest to the real date they travelled to.



Details:



  • It's not time travel per se, but more a kind of simulation, so interaction in the past won't have impact on the present.

  • We will all travel to the same time period, but we will not be able to interact with each other.

  • We will stay more or less in the same area, i.e. western Europe. Sometimes in the middle of a forest, sometimes inside a city, but always western Europe.

  • Each of us are fluent in French, and know some basics of English, Spanish and German. Local people will speak the language that was spoken during their time period in their specific region.

  • We are not historians, and even subjects to some TV-tropes and other cliches.

  • We can't bring any device with us, like a computer or astronomical tools.

  • The amount of time before we come back to the current time period is unknown to us, but always between 5 minutes and 5 days. Ideally, I would like a method to do a rough estimation, and narrow it more and more untill I came back to modern times.

  • If you die in the simulation, you go back to the present. Being killed have no impact on current time, but is still good to avoid as you can feel pain and you will have less time than others to estimate on what period you landed

  • We have no time to prepare ourself: the wizard just give us few minutes so we can decide if we want to play, but no time to learn greek or do a PHD in history. I can do a quick google research like translate a phrase in latin, but nothing that take more than a minute.

  • Estimation such as "X year of reign of dude Y" are accepted if it's the contemporary way to count years

  • You have to answer immediately after you get back

This might be seen as a duplicate of the question My time machine needs to know when it is at first, but that question focuses on tools and science (astronomy, carbon dating...) to have an exact dating, while my question focuses on estimation using no tools, interacting with local folks, trying to evaluate technological advance, studying architecture...



How could I know when I landed?







share|improve this question













Today a weird guy with a pointy hat offered me and my friends to play a game: We will all travel back in time, to a random date somewhen from the antiquity to modern times. We will have a limited amount of time to do whatever we want before returning to our current world. After that time, each of us tries to guess the date we travelled to and the winner is the one who comes closest to the real date they travelled to.



Details:



  • It's not time travel per se, but more a kind of simulation, so interaction in the past won't have impact on the present.

  • We will all travel to the same time period, but we will not be able to interact with each other.

  • We will stay more or less in the same area, i.e. western Europe. Sometimes in the middle of a forest, sometimes inside a city, but always western Europe.

  • Each of us are fluent in French, and know some basics of English, Spanish and German. Local people will speak the language that was spoken during their time period in their specific region.

  • We are not historians, and even subjects to some TV-tropes and other cliches.

  • We can't bring any device with us, like a computer or astronomical tools.

  • The amount of time before we come back to the current time period is unknown to us, but always between 5 minutes and 5 days. Ideally, I would like a method to do a rough estimation, and narrow it more and more untill I came back to modern times.

  • If you die in the simulation, you go back to the present. Being killed have no impact on current time, but is still good to avoid as you can feel pain and you will have less time than others to estimate on what period you landed

  • We have no time to prepare ourself: the wizard just give us few minutes so we can decide if we want to play, but no time to learn greek or do a PHD in history. I can do a quick google research like translate a phrase in latin, but nothing that take more than a minute.

  • Estimation such as "X year of reign of dude Y" are accepted if it's the contemporary way to count years

  • You have to answer immediately after you get back

This might be seen as a duplicate of the question My time machine needs to know when it is at first, but that question focuses on tools and science (astronomy, carbon dating...) to have an exact dating, while my question focuses on estimation using no tools, interacting with local folks, trying to evaluate technological advance, studying architecture...



How could I know when I landed?









share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday
























asked yesterday









Kepotx

1,659921




1,659921







  • 1




    Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
    – AlexP
    yesterday







  • 12




    This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
    – Swier
    yesterday






  • 2




    Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
    – gerrit
    yesterday






  • 5




    Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
    – Drag and Drop
    yesterday







  • 1




    @Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
    – Alexander
    yesterday












  • 1




    Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
    – AlexP
    yesterday







  • 12




    This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
    – Swier
    yesterday






  • 2




    Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
    – gerrit
    yesterday






  • 5




    Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
    – Drag and Drop
    yesterday







  • 1




    @Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
    – Alexander
    yesterday







1




1




Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
– AlexP
yesterday





Are you allowed to prepare for the test? For example, learn some history, or learn some Latin and Greek? (Chances are than with Latin and Greek you would be able to talk to anybody who was somebody in Western Europe from about the 2nd century BCE to the 17th or 18th century CE, if not directly then through an interpreter.)
– AlexP
yesterday





12




12




This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
– Swier
yesterday




This reminds me of the game geoguesser, which takes to you to a google streetview at a random location on Earth: geoguessr.com It is surprising how quick you can narrow down your rough location just by the type of plants, mountains, road markings, etc.. However, it's really hard if you get dropped on some forest road in the middle of, say, Iowa. I imagine for your question it would be easy if you land in a city, but very hard if you find yourself somewhere in Northern Scotland, miles away from anyone.
– Swier
yesterday




2




2




Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
– gerrit
yesterday




Do I have to answer immediately after I get back? Or can I gather evidence, take notes, then do some research after getting back to the present, in order to use the evidence I gathered to determine the time I visited?
– gerrit
yesterday




5




5




Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
– Drag and Drop
yesterday





Find a pub, pretend to be drunk, ask for the date. If there is no pub or bar or tarvern, you don't wan't to be there!
– Drag and Drop
yesterday





1




1




@Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
– Alexander
yesterday




@Drag and Drop you might get a date with a barmaid, but that date might not be what you are looking for :)
– Alexander
yesterday










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
28
down vote













It's hard to come with a single method that both works when you have 5 minutes in a dense forest, and 5 days in a city. But here are some ideas:



  • Find out who the current pope is.

  • Locate a graveyard (or a church with in-church burial), search for the most recent date on a tomb stone.

  • Search through church records (weddings, burials, baptism) for the most recent date. If you've landed (or rather, suspect to be landed) in the 19th, 20th or 21st century, search through city records. (How to get access to those records is left as an exercise for the reader).

  • Try to find out what the current art movements are. (This will work better the more you are to current times).

  • Availability/scarcity of food in general, or specific foods. Is salt scarce? Is sugar available? How do carrots look like? Do people drink tea? Coffee? Are exotic spices available? If so, how affordable are they?

  • If you know (or figured out) where you are: which landmarks are there, and which ones are not there yet?

  • What type of clothing do people wear?

  • What kind of ships/boats are people using?





share|improve this answer

















  • 26




    If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday







  • 8




    Tombstone scheme is good!
    – Willk
    yesterday










  • coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
    – John
    yesterday











  • @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
    – Abigail
    yesterday











  • As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
    – John
    yesterday

















up vote
24
down vote













  • Search for some money: coins were made according to the reigning king, they might give a fair estimate for the period you are in.

  • If you are in a major city, take a look at the most recent churches or religious building. Their architectural style can hint to the period.

  • Search for potatoes, corn and tomatoes. At least you can tell if you are before or after 1492.

  • Search for some soldiers: their weapons and uniform can point you to a time period.

  • I would not ask around "which year is this?", as it would be highly suspect. Once you have a rough estimate of the region and the time period, try asking how long has it been since . I.e. if you suspect you are in the South of Italy shortly after the Battle of Canne, try asking "how long ago was the battle of Canne? 5 years?"





share|improve this answer



















  • 6




    I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
    – klskl
    yesterday






  • 1




    @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday






  • 1




    @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
    – alexgbelov
    yesterday










  • @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday











  • @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday


















up vote
14
down vote













There are a few simple technologies that should be very widespread that you can look for. Stirrups (you’re almost certainly in the 8th century or later), chimneys (16th century in ordinary homes), horse collars (10th century), iron horseshoes (12th century), glass windows (17th century in ordinary homes).






share|improve this answer

















  • 8




    Mirrors. Smoking.
    – Anthony
    yesterday










  • @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday






  • 5




    Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
    – Separatrix
    yesterday

















up vote
12
down vote













You only need to learn the phrase "What year is it?" in Latin. If you can find civilization, you'll most likely find clergy and they can answer your question.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
    – AlexP
    yesterday










  • Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
    – Kepotx
    yesterday







  • 14




    @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday











  • @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
    – Kepotx
    yesterday






  • 7




    It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
    – Annatar
    yesterday

















up vote
11
down vote













Find the nearest Pub, Tarvern, or Bar.
You only need to play drunk and know one sentense in the different language you encounter.



Now repeat after me and don't worry about the accent you are drunk:




"My Wife is going to kill me! What day/month/year it is?"




And you can also locate yourself with this trick.




My Wife is going to kill me! Where the fuck m'I?"




If there is no bar, pub or tavern.. I don't know what is the worst beeing lost in time or no bar, pub, nor tavern.






share|improve this answer





















  • For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
    – wizzwizz4
    2 hours ago

















up vote
8
down vote













You should first make a rough guesstimate of which time period you are in (based on architecture, fashion, tools, etc. that you see), and then go from there:



modern times



If things seem more or less modern, say 18th century or more, look for a newspaper, which should have the current date. Newspapers came into existence in the 17th century, so from the 18th or so onward they should be common enough that you can find one easily.



middle ages



From around the 12th century, figure out where you are, by language. If you seem to be in England or France, or in some place that seems more or less organized, go to the local church and get a look at their records. The middle ages were notoriously beaurocratic and kept an excellent record of births, deaths, marriages, taxes on market stalls, sizes of grounds of each farmer family and a hundred more things. Typically, the local church was the place for these records. They will contain the date somewhere.



early dark ages



Between the downfall of the Roman Empire and the middle ages, things are a bit messy. Your best bet might be tombstones or churches where dates are inscribed and then making a guess on how old they are. This far back, these are likely also the only things that you have a good chance of reading and understanding as what passed for english (or french, spanish, etc.) at that time is not very close to our modern versions. And remember that dates are most likely to be inscribed in roman style (i.e. MMXVIII)



Roman Empire



If it seems that romans are around (look for latin inscriptions on still-in-use buildings, or roman fashion), and you speak a bit of latin or can memorize a few phrases, simply ask for the date. Yes, it might be weird, but Rome was a mix of so many cultures that especially if you seem foreign and speak bad latin, it is quite plausible that you don't know the year by roman reckoning.



Note that you could land in the time of the Roman Empire but outside its borders (Scotland, Scandinavia, Northern Germany, etc.) in which case the section below applies.



antiquity



If you don't see any roman roads around, and it clearly isn't yet the middle ages as well, you are in antiquity. Good luck. There will be almost no writing or inscriptions available, nor will anyone speak something that you would recognize as a language you know, even if it is an ancestor of such. Your best bet is to look at what tools, clothes and building style people have and then make a wild guess.



(for example, you can look if there are iron tools - but iron working was introduced between 1100 BC and 500 BC, depending on which part of Europe you are in - and good luck finding that out.)






share|improve this answer























  • Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
    – Arluin
    yesterday


















up vote
7
down vote













You look to the stars.

And look for the Barnard' Star. And the distance from a line you setup at the moment of travel. The thing is that Barnard star travel a "pinky length" every 350 years Observing star for amateur astronomer.

So you just measure the pinkies and approx. the time with +/- 175 years.



you would need some more time than 5 minutes but I assure you that if you get spawned in forest prior to industrialization (and some part of modern times) even 1 day could not be enough to get to any signs of civilization.






share|improve this answer



















  • 7




    Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday







  • 7




    @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday






  • 3




    @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday







  • 3




    If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
    – gerrit
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday


















up vote
6
down vote













Perhaps you could look up, in both Latin and Greek if possible, a question akin to "How many years ago did Jesus Christ come to earth?" With a little convincing, and communication with any member of the church, friar, monk or priest, you would likely be able to play ignorant enough that it would seem like a naive question rather than the ramblings of a madman. Obviously, anyone with any sort of religious education would know Year A.D. = years since Jesus' birth. Would be quick and dirty, plus most of Europe would be within a few days of the nearest religious figure.



Keep in mind, calendars change and are variable. However, the Catholic Church has been pretty solid on having at least internal consistency. If you're dealing with Catholics, Pre-1582 dates should be specified in the Julian Calendar. Since local time systems seem to be acceptable to the wizard, that should work. After 1582 it may be a little shaky, but good God-fearing Catholics will generally be on the Gregorian Calendar. Protestant Europe would be trickier, but then again, Jesus' birth would still be a good milestone, and a decent first-pass guess. Vernacular mass will be a dead giveaway if you're in Protestant country.



Another option would be to get the basic formula of a Catholic Mass down, and pray (haha) that your period of time allows you to get to Mass. I believe Catholic Latin Mass should generally reference the name of the reigning Pope. That gives you a pretty narrow window, for most places and times. And if the mass is being held in NOT Latin, that's a pretty huge hint too.






share|improve this answer























  • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
    – JBH
    yesterday










  • That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
    – AnxiousFiend
    yesterday






  • 2




    @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday










  • @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
    – JBH
    yesterday










  • I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
    – Jetpack
    5 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote













Not really an answer, but if you are more than 500 or 600 years in the past, the local French or English will be hard for you to understand.



Best case scenario, it will be easier for you to understand a drunken Quebecois or Irishman than someone speaking Middle French or Middle English. And the further you go in time the worst it will be.






share|improve this answer























  • Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
    – Gryphon
    yesterday






  • 2




    “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
    – HopelessN00b
    yesterday

















up vote
0
down vote













During your minutes of prep time, look up how to write "What year is it?" in as many languages as you can think of. You already have a head start because you already know this phrase in four of the most useful languages, so you can try to learn Italian, Latin, Dutch, Portuguese, Swedish, Arabic (for the years 711 to 1492), Basque. When you land write them down as soon as you can.



If you're allowed to bring your own paper and a pen, then this is super easy.



The first time you see someone, you can show them the paper and try to sound out words, and give them a chance to write down the answer. If you have an informants that are familiar with one of these languages, and are patient enough to work through your strange pronunciation, spelling, and handwriting, I think this is the method that is most likely to work.



If you can't get any understanding that way, you can start writing down "ANNO DOMINI" next to years written in Roman numerals and Arabic numerals. At this point, you're playing Charades, and I don't know how easy it is to get an answer.



If none of these work, you can start looking for graveyards, and buildings with years written on them.






share|improve this answer




















    protected by Community♦ 13 hours ago



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    10 Answers
    10






    active

    oldest

    votes








    10 Answers
    10






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    28
    down vote













    It's hard to come with a single method that both works when you have 5 minutes in a dense forest, and 5 days in a city. But here are some ideas:



    • Find out who the current pope is.

    • Locate a graveyard (or a church with in-church burial), search for the most recent date on a tomb stone.

    • Search through church records (weddings, burials, baptism) for the most recent date. If you've landed (or rather, suspect to be landed) in the 19th, 20th or 21st century, search through city records. (How to get access to those records is left as an exercise for the reader).

    • Try to find out what the current art movements are. (This will work better the more you are to current times).

    • Availability/scarcity of food in general, or specific foods. Is salt scarce? Is sugar available? How do carrots look like? Do people drink tea? Coffee? Are exotic spices available? If so, how affordable are they?

    • If you know (or figured out) where you are: which landmarks are there, and which ones are not there yet?

    • What type of clothing do people wear?

    • What kind of ships/boats are people using?





    share|improve this answer

















    • 26




      If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 8




      Tombstone scheme is good!
      – Willk
      yesterday










    • coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
      – John
      yesterday











    • @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
      – Abigail
      yesterday











    • As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
      – John
      yesterday














    up vote
    28
    down vote













    It's hard to come with a single method that both works when you have 5 minutes in a dense forest, and 5 days in a city. But here are some ideas:



    • Find out who the current pope is.

    • Locate a graveyard (or a church with in-church burial), search for the most recent date on a tomb stone.

    • Search through church records (weddings, burials, baptism) for the most recent date. If you've landed (or rather, suspect to be landed) in the 19th, 20th or 21st century, search through city records. (How to get access to those records is left as an exercise for the reader).

    • Try to find out what the current art movements are. (This will work better the more you are to current times).

    • Availability/scarcity of food in general, or specific foods. Is salt scarce? Is sugar available? How do carrots look like? Do people drink tea? Coffee? Are exotic spices available? If so, how affordable are they?

    • If you know (or figured out) where you are: which landmarks are there, and which ones are not there yet?

    • What type of clothing do people wear?

    • What kind of ships/boats are people using?





    share|improve this answer

















    • 26




      If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 8




      Tombstone scheme is good!
      – Willk
      yesterday










    • coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
      – John
      yesterday











    • @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
      – Abigail
      yesterday











    • As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
      – John
      yesterday












    up vote
    28
    down vote










    up vote
    28
    down vote









    It's hard to come with a single method that both works when you have 5 minutes in a dense forest, and 5 days in a city. But here are some ideas:



    • Find out who the current pope is.

    • Locate a graveyard (or a church with in-church burial), search for the most recent date on a tomb stone.

    • Search through church records (weddings, burials, baptism) for the most recent date. If you've landed (or rather, suspect to be landed) in the 19th, 20th or 21st century, search through city records. (How to get access to those records is left as an exercise for the reader).

    • Try to find out what the current art movements are. (This will work better the more you are to current times).

    • Availability/scarcity of food in general, or specific foods. Is salt scarce? Is sugar available? How do carrots look like? Do people drink tea? Coffee? Are exotic spices available? If so, how affordable are they?

    • If you know (or figured out) where you are: which landmarks are there, and which ones are not there yet?

    • What type of clothing do people wear?

    • What kind of ships/boats are people using?





    share|improve this answer













    It's hard to come with a single method that both works when you have 5 minutes in a dense forest, and 5 days in a city. But here are some ideas:



    • Find out who the current pope is.

    • Locate a graveyard (or a church with in-church burial), search for the most recent date on a tomb stone.

    • Search through church records (weddings, burials, baptism) for the most recent date. If you've landed (or rather, suspect to be landed) in the 19th, 20th or 21st century, search through city records. (How to get access to those records is left as an exercise for the reader).

    • Try to find out what the current art movements are. (This will work better the more you are to current times).

    • Availability/scarcity of food in general, or specific foods. Is salt scarce? Is sugar available? How do carrots look like? Do people drink tea? Coffee? Are exotic spices available? If so, how affordable are they?

    • If you know (or figured out) where you are: which landmarks are there, and which ones are not there yet?

    • What type of clothing do people wear?

    • What kind of ships/boats are people using?






    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered yesterday









    Abigail

    1,077113




    1,077113







    • 26




      If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 8




      Tombstone scheme is good!
      – Willk
      yesterday










    • coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
      – John
      yesterday











    • @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
      – Abigail
      yesterday











    • As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
      – John
      yesterday












    • 26




      If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 8




      Tombstone scheme is good!
      – Willk
      yesterday










    • coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
      – John
      yesterday











    • @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
      – Abigail
      yesterday











    • As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
      – John
      yesterday







    26




    26




    If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    If you’ve landed in the 19th, 20th or 21st centuries, you don’t need to find public records. Just go into a newsagent’s shop and look at the dates on the newspapers, which will get you the exact date.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    8




    8




    Tombstone scheme is good!
    – Willk
    yesterday




    Tombstone scheme is good!
    – Willk
    yesterday












    coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
    – John
    yesterday





    coinage will also be a good rough estimate. especially if you can look a t a lot of it.
    – John
    yesterday













    @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
    – Abigail
    yesterday





    @John , yes, but since that was already mentioned in another answer, I left it out.
    – Abigail
    yesterday













    As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
    – John
    yesterday




    As for getting access to records marriage records were basically public record.
    – John
    yesterday










    up vote
    24
    down vote













    • Search for some money: coins were made according to the reigning king, they might give a fair estimate for the period you are in.

    • If you are in a major city, take a look at the most recent churches or religious building. Their architectural style can hint to the period.

    • Search for potatoes, corn and tomatoes. At least you can tell if you are before or after 1492.

    • Search for some soldiers: their weapons and uniform can point you to a time period.

    • I would not ask around "which year is this?", as it would be highly suspect. Once you have a rough estimate of the region and the time period, try asking how long has it been since . I.e. if you suspect you are in the South of Italy shortly after the Battle of Canne, try asking "how long ago was the battle of Canne? 5 years?"





    share|improve this answer



















    • 6




      I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
      – klskl
      yesterday






    • 1




      @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday






    • 1




      @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
      – alexgbelov
      yesterday










    • @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday











    • @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday















    up vote
    24
    down vote













    • Search for some money: coins were made according to the reigning king, they might give a fair estimate for the period you are in.

    • If you are in a major city, take a look at the most recent churches or religious building. Their architectural style can hint to the period.

    • Search for potatoes, corn and tomatoes. At least you can tell if you are before or after 1492.

    • Search for some soldiers: their weapons and uniform can point you to a time period.

    • I would not ask around "which year is this?", as it would be highly suspect. Once you have a rough estimate of the region and the time period, try asking how long has it been since . I.e. if you suspect you are in the South of Italy shortly after the Battle of Canne, try asking "how long ago was the battle of Canne? 5 years?"





    share|improve this answer



















    • 6




      I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
      – klskl
      yesterday






    • 1




      @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday






    • 1




      @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
      – alexgbelov
      yesterday










    • @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday











    • @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday













    up vote
    24
    down vote










    up vote
    24
    down vote









    • Search for some money: coins were made according to the reigning king, they might give a fair estimate for the period you are in.

    • If you are in a major city, take a look at the most recent churches or religious building. Their architectural style can hint to the period.

    • Search for potatoes, corn and tomatoes. At least you can tell if you are before or after 1492.

    • Search for some soldiers: their weapons and uniform can point you to a time period.

    • I would not ask around "which year is this?", as it would be highly suspect. Once you have a rough estimate of the region and the time period, try asking how long has it been since . I.e. if you suspect you are in the South of Italy shortly after the Battle of Canne, try asking "how long ago was the battle of Canne? 5 years?"





    share|improve this answer















    • Search for some money: coins were made according to the reigning king, they might give a fair estimate for the period you are in.

    • If you are in a major city, take a look at the most recent churches or religious building. Their architectural style can hint to the period.

    • Search for potatoes, corn and tomatoes. At least you can tell if you are before or after 1492.

    • Search for some soldiers: their weapons and uniform can point you to a time period.

    • I would not ask around "which year is this?", as it would be highly suspect. Once you have a rough estimate of the region and the time period, try asking how long has it been since . I.e. if you suspect you are in the South of Italy shortly after the Battle of Canne, try asking "how long ago was the battle of Canne? 5 years?"






    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday


























    answered yesterday









    L.Dutch♦

    56.1k13135264




    56.1k13135264







    • 6




      I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
      – klskl
      yesterday






    • 1




      @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday






    • 1




      @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
      – alexgbelov
      yesterday










    • @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday











    • @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday













    • 6




      I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
      – klskl
      yesterday






    • 1




      @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday






    • 1




      @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
      – alexgbelov
      yesterday










    • @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday











    • @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
      – M. A. Golding
      yesterday








    6




    6




    I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
    – klskl
    yesterday




    I would not be able to tell date based on coins depicting kings (unless the coins has dates on them obviously), by church design, soldier uniform or know about potatoes without pretty well history knowledge
    – klskl
    yesterday




    1




    1




    @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday




    @L.Dutch - the time traveler's costume, and perhaps his face, would obviously look foreign, so admitting that he is a traveler wouldn't surprise anyone, so he could ask what is the year and date according to their local system. If he can speak with the natives at all. Even when the Julian calendar became used in all Europe, centuries after it was first adopted in 44 BC, there were still many local differences in when the year started and when the year count started from, so people familiar with travelers should not find the question too strange.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday




    1




    1




    @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
    – alexgbelov
    yesterday




    @M.A.Golding of course, the corollary to that is that knowing the local date might not be of any use in guessing the "modern" version of that date
    – alexgbelov
    yesterday












    @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday





    @alexgbelov - Yes, Portugal was the last western European country to switch to AD year counting. Portugal used the Spanish Era or Era of the Caesars which had its year one in 38 BC, until switching to Anno Domini in 1422 AD. So if the time traveler was told it was the year 1300 in Portugal, it would actually be about 1262 AD, and he could lose if another time traveler guessed the year correctly within 20 years, for example.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday













    @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday





    @Kiski - I have extensive knowledge of the reigns of various European rulers through history, far more that most people. But I know most of them by their regnal numbers, which were mostly given by historians centuries later. So the people would know rulers by their nicknames, which I am not so familiar with. So I would have to ask questions about previous rulers and foreign rulers, and recent important events, and so on. If I could speak the language, of course.
    – M. A. Golding
    yesterday











    up vote
    14
    down vote













    There are a few simple technologies that should be very widespread that you can look for. Stirrups (you’re almost certainly in the 8th century or later), chimneys (16th century in ordinary homes), horse collars (10th century), iron horseshoes (12th century), glass windows (17th century in ordinary homes).






    share|improve this answer

















    • 8




      Mirrors. Smoking.
      – Anthony
      yesterday










    • @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 5




      Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
      – Separatrix
      yesterday














    up vote
    14
    down vote













    There are a few simple technologies that should be very widespread that you can look for. Stirrups (you’re almost certainly in the 8th century or later), chimneys (16th century in ordinary homes), horse collars (10th century), iron horseshoes (12th century), glass windows (17th century in ordinary homes).






    share|improve this answer

















    • 8




      Mirrors. Smoking.
      – Anthony
      yesterday










    • @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 5




      Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
      – Separatrix
      yesterday












    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    There are a few simple technologies that should be very widespread that you can look for. Stirrups (you’re almost certainly in the 8th century or later), chimneys (16th century in ordinary homes), horse collars (10th century), iron horseshoes (12th century), glass windows (17th century in ordinary homes).






    share|improve this answer













    There are a few simple technologies that should be very widespread that you can look for. Stirrups (you’re almost certainly in the 8th century or later), chimneys (16th century in ordinary homes), horse collars (10th century), iron horseshoes (12th century), glass windows (17th century in ordinary homes).







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered yesterday









    Mike Scott

    7,84431535




    7,84431535







    • 8




      Mirrors. Smoking.
      – Anthony
      yesterday










    • @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 5




      Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
      – Separatrix
      yesterday












    • 8




      Mirrors. Smoking.
      – Anthony
      yesterday










    • @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 5




      Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
      – Separatrix
      yesterday







    8




    8




    Mirrors. Smoking.
    – Anthony
    yesterday




    Mirrors. Smoking.
    – Anthony
    yesterday












    @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday




    @Anthony Yes, two more fine examples.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday




    5




    5




    Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
    – Separatrix
    yesterday




    Being immediately arrested for wearing the wrong colours, anywhere from 13th to 17thC
    – Separatrix
    yesterday










    up vote
    12
    down vote













    You only need to learn the phrase "What year is it?" in Latin. If you can find civilization, you'll most likely find clergy and they can answer your question.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 5




      And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
      – AlexP
      yesterday










    • Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
      – Kepotx
      yesterday







    • 14




      @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday











    • @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
      – Kepotx
      yesterday






    • 7




      It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
      – Annatar
      yesterday














    up vote
    12
    down vote













    You only need to learn the phrase "What year is it?" in Latin. If you can find civilization, you'll most likely find clergy and they can answer your question.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 5




      And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
      – AlexP
      yesterday










    • Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
      – Kepotx
      yesterday







    • 14




      @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday











    • @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
      – Kepotx
      yesterday






    • 7




      It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
      – Annatar
      yesterday












    up vote
    12
    down vote










    up vote
    12
    down vote









    You only need to learn the phrase "What year is it?" in Latin. If you can find civilization, you'll most likely find clergy and they can answer your question.






    share|improve this answer













    You only need to learn the phrase "What year is it?" in Latin. If you can find civilization, you'll most likely find clergy and they can answer your question.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered yesterday









    Krateng

    619617




    619617







    • 5




      And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
      – AlexP
      yesterday










    • Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
      – Kepotx
      yesterday







    • 14




      @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday











    • @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
      – Kepotx
      yesterday






    • 7




      It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
      – Annatar
      yesterday












    • 5




      And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
      – AlexP
      yesterday










    • Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
      – Kepotx
      yesterday







    • 14




      @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday











    • @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
      – Kepotx
      yesterday






    • 7




      It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
      – Annatar
      yesterday







    5




    5




    And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
    – AlexP
    yesterday




    And in Greek. Before the 1st century CE the chances of being understood in Greek were quite a bit larger than in Latin.
    – AlexP
    yesterday












    Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
    – Kepotx
    yesterday





    Nice one, but I'm not sure to find a clergy man in a short amount of time, don't speak latin (i could quickly check on google translate just before we start the game, but no more), and as BC/AD was not common untill medieval time ("fifth year of reign of Caius" wont help me), it won't work 100% time. Still a good and quick way to win
    – Kepotx
    yesterday





    14




    14




    @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    @Kepotx “The fifth year of the reign of Caius” is the date you travelled to, and so should be enough to win the competition. You didn’t specify in what era the date should be.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday













    @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
    – Kepotx
    yesterday




    @MikeScott agree, i edited my question to accept such dates
    – Kepotx
    yesterday




    7




    7




    It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
    – Annatar
    yesterday




    It's of little use to know that single Latin question if you can't translate the answer (in Latin or the mother tongue of the priest).
    – Annatar
    yesterday










    up vote
    11
    down vote













    Find the nearest Pub, Tarvern, or Bar.
    You only need to play drunk and know one sentense in the different language you encounter.



    Now repeat after me and don't worry about the accent you are drunk:




    "My Wife is going to kill me! What day/month/year it is?"




    And you can also locate yourself with this trick.




    My Wife is going to kill me! Where the fuck m'I?"




    If there is no bar, pub or tavern.. I don't know what is the worst beeing lost in time or no bar, pub, nor tavern.






    share|improve this answer





















    • For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
      – wizzwizz4
      2 hours ago














    up vote
    11
    down vote













    Find the nearest Pub, Tarvern, or Bar.
    You only need to play drunk and know one sentense in the different language you encounter.



    Now repeat after me and don't worry about the accent you are drunk:




    "My Wife is going to kill me! What day/month/year it is?"




    And you can also locate yourself with this trick.




    My Wife is going to kill me! Where the fuck m'I?"




    If there is no bar, pub or tavern.. I don't know what is the worst beeing lost in time or no bar, pub, nor tavern.






    share|improve this answer





















    • For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
      – wizzwizz4
      2 hours ago












    up vote
    11
    down vote










    up vote
    11
    down vote









    Find the nearest Pub, Tarvern, or Bar.
    You only need to play drunk and know one sentense in the different language you encounter.



    Now repeat after me and don't worry about the accent you are drunk:




    "My Wife is going to kill me! What day/month/year it is?"




    And you can also locate yourself with this trick.




    My Wife is going to kill me! Where the fuck m'I?"




    If there is no bar, pub or tavern.. I don't know what is the worst beeing lost in time or no bar, pub, nor tavern.






    share|improve this answer













    Find the nearest Pub, Tarvern, or Bar.
    You only need to play drunk and know one sentense in the different language you encounter.



    Now repeat after me and don't worry about the accent you are drunk:




    "My Wife is going to kill me! What day/month/year it is?"




    And you can also locate yourself with this trick.




    My Wife is going to kill me! Where the fuck m'I?"




    If there is no bar, pub or tavern.. I don't know what is the worst beeing lost in time or no bar, pub, nor tavern.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer











    answered yesterday









    Drag and Drop

    6501618




    6501618











    • For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
      – wizzwizz4
      2 hours ago
















    • For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
      – wizzwizz4
      2 hours ago















    For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
    – wizzwizz4
    2 hours ago




    For the latter, people will tell you where you are. "The Red Cox" or something. Not "East Saxonbridge in Swansealand".
    – wizzwizz4
    2 hours ago










    up vote
    8
    down vote













    You should first make a rough guesstimate of which time period you are in (based on architecture, fashion, tools, etc. that you see), and then go from there:



    modern times



    If things seem more or less modern, say 18th century or more, look for a newspaper, which should have the current date. Newspapers came into existence in the 17th century, so from the 18th or so onward they should be common enough that you can find one easily.



    middle ages



    From around the 12th century, figure out where you are, by language. If you seem to be in England or France, or in some place that seems more or less organized, go to the local church and get a look at their records. The middle ages were notoriously beaurocratic and kept an excellent record of births, deaths, marriages, taxes on market stalls, sizes of grounds of each farmer family and a hundred more things. Typically, the local church was the place for these records. They will contain the date somewhere.



    early dark ages



    Between the downfall of the Roman Empire and the middle ages, things are a bit messy. Your best bet might be tombstones or churches where dates are inscribed and then making a guess on how old they are. This far back, these are likely also the only things that you have a good chance of reading and understanding as what passed for english (or french, spanish, etc.) at that time is not very close to our modern versions. And remember that dates are most likely to be inscribed in roman style (i.e. MMXVIII)



    Roman Empire



    If it seems that romans are around (look for latin inscriptions on still-in-use buildings, or roman fashion), and you speak a bit of latin or can memorize a few phrases, simply ask for the date. Yes, it might be weird, but Rome was a mix of so many cultures that especially if you seem foreign and speak bad latin, it is quite plausible that you don't know the year by roman reckoning.



    Note that you could land in the time of the Roman Empire but outside its borders (Scotland, Scandinavia, Northern Germany, etc.) in which case the section below applies.



    antiquity



    If you don't see any roman roads around, and it clearly isn't yet the middle ages as well, you are in antiquity. Good luck. There will be almost no writing or inscriptions available, nor will anyone speak something that you would recognize as a language you know, even if it is an ancestor of such. Your best bet is to look at what tools, clothes and building style people have and then make a wild guess.



    (for example, you can look if there are iron tools - but iron working was introduced between 1100 BC and 500 BC, depending on which part of Europe you are in - and good luck finding that out.)






    share|improve this answer























    • Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
      – Arluin
      yesterday















    up vote
    8
    down vote













    You should first make a rough guesstimate of which time period you are in (based on architecture, fashion, tools, etc. that you see), and then go from there:



    modern times



    If things seem more or less modern, say 18th century or more, look for a newspaper, which should have the current date. Newspapers came into existence in the 17th century, so from the 18th or so onward they should be common enough that you can find one easily.



    middle ages



    From around the 12th century, figure out where you are, by language. If you seem to be in England or France, or in some place that seems more or less organized, go to the local church and get a look at their records. The middle ages were notoriously beaurocratic and kept an excellent record of births, deaths, marriages, taxes on market stalls, sizes of grounds of each farmer family and a hundred more things. Typically, the local church was the place for these records. They will contain the date somewhere.



    early dark ages



    Between the downfall of the Roman Empire and the middle ages, things are a bit messy. Your best bet might be tombstones or churches where dates are inscribed and then making a guess on how old they are. This far back, these are likely also the only things that you have a good chance of reading and understanding as what passed for english (or french, spanish, etc.) at that time is not very close to our modern versions. And remember that dates are most likely to be inscribed in roman style (i.e. MMXVIII)



    Roman Empire



    If it seems that romans are around (look for latin inscriptions on still-in-use buildings, or roman fashion), and you speak a bit of latin or can memorize a few phrases, simply ask for the date. Yes, it might be weird, but Rome was a mix of so many cultures that especially if you seem foreign and speak bad latin, it is quite plausible that you don't know the year by roman reckoning.



    Note that you could land in the time of the Roman Empire but outside its borders (Scotland, Scandinavia, Northern Germany, etc.) in which case the section below applies.



    antiquity



    If you don't see any roman roads around, and it clearly isn't yet the middle ages as well, you are in antiquity. Good luck. There will be almost no writing or inscriptions available, nor will anyone speak something that you would recognize as a language you know, even if it is an ancestor of such. Your best bet is to look at what tools, clothes and building style people have and then make a wild guess.



    (for example, you can look if there are iron tools - but iron working was introduced between 1100 BC and 500 BC, depending on which part of Europe you are in - and good luck finding that out.)






    share|improve this answer























    • Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
      – Arluin
      yesterday













    up vote
    8
    down vote










    up vote
    8
    down vote









    You should first make a rough guesstimate of which time period you are in (based on architecture, fashion, tools, etc. that you see), and then go from there:



    modern times



    If things seem more or less modern, say 18th century or more, look for a newspaper, which should have the current date. Newspapers came into existence in the 17th century, so from the 18th or so onward they should be common enough that you can find one easily.



    middle ages



    From around the 12th century, figure out where you are, by language. If you seem to be in England or France, or in some place that seems more or less organized, go to the local church and get a look at their records. The middle ages were notoriously beaurocratic and kept an excellent record of births, deaths, marriages, taxes on market stalls, sizes of grounds of each farmer family and a hundred more things. Typically, the local church was the place for these records. They will contain the date somewhere.



    early dark ages



    Between the downfall of the Roman Empire and the middle ages, things are a bit messy. Your best bet might be tombstones or churches where dates are inscribed and then making a guess on how old they are. This far back, these are likely also the only things that you have a good chance of reading and understanding as what passed for english (or french, spanish, etc.) at that time is not very close to our modern versions. And remember that dates are most likely to be inscribed in roman style (i.e. MMXVIII)



    Roman Empire



    If it seems that romans are around (look for latin inscriptions on still-in-use buildings, or roman fashion), and you speak a bit of latin or can memorize a few phrases, simply ask for the date. Yes, it might be weird, but Rome was a mix of so many cultures that especially if you seem foreign and speak bad latin, it is quite plausible that you don't know the year by roman reckoning.



    Note that you could land in the time of the Roman Empire but outside its borders (Scotland, Scandinavia, Northern Germany, etc.) in which case the section below applies.



    antiquity



    If you don't see any roman roads around, and it clearly isn't yet the middle ages as well, you are in antiquity. Good luck. There will be almost no writing or inscriptions available, nor will anyone speak something that you would recognize as a language you know, even if it is an ancestor of such. Your best bet is to look at what tools, clothes and building style people have and then make a wild guess.



    (for example, you can look if there are iron tools - but iron working was introduced between 1100 BC and 500 BC, depending on which part of Europe you are in - and good luck finding that out.)






    share|improve this answer















    You should first make a rough guesstimate of which time period you are in (based on architecture, fashion, tools, etc. that you see), and then go from there:



    modern times



    If things seem more or less modern, say 18th century or more, look for a newspaper, which should have the current date. Newspapers came into existence in the 17th century, so from the 18th or so onward they should be common enough that you can find one easily.



    middle ages



    From around the 12th century, figure out where you are, by language. If you seem to be in England or France, or in some place that seems more or less organized, go to the local church and get a look at their records. The middle ages were notoriously beaurocratic and kept an excellent record of births, deaths, marriages, taxes on market stalls, sizes of grounds of each farmer family and a hundred more things. Typically, the local church was the place for these records. They will contain the date somewhere.



    early dark ages



    Between the downfall of the Roman Empire and the middle ages, things are a bit messy. Your best bet might be tombstones or churches where dates are inscribed and then making a guess on how old they are. This far back, these are likely also the only things that you have a good chance of reading and understanding as what passed for english (or french, spanish, etc.) at that time is not very close to our modern versions. And remember that dates are most likely to be inscribed in roman style (i.e. MMXVIII)



    Roman Empire



    If it seems that romans are around (look for latin inscriptions on still-in-use buildings, or roman fashion), and you speak a bit of latin or can memorize a few phrases, simply ask for the date. Yes, it might be weird, but Rome was a mix of so many cultures that especially if you seem foreign and speak bad latin, it is quite plausible that you don't know the year by roman reckoning.



    Note that you could land in the time of the Roman Empire but outside its borders (Scotland, Scandinavia, Northern Germany, etc.) in which case the section below applies.



    antiquity



    If you don't see any roman roads around, and it clearly isn't yet the middle ages as well, you are in antiquity. Good luck. There will be almost no writing or inscriptions available, nor will anyone speak something that you would recognize as a language you know, even if it is an ancestor of such. Your best bet is to look at what tools, clothes and building style people have and then make a wild guess.



    (for example, you can look if there are iron tools - but iron working was introduced between 1100 BC and 500 BC, depending on which part of Europe you are in - and good luck finding that out.)







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday


























    answered yesterday









    Tom

    2,895318




    2,895318











    • Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
      – Arluin
      yesterday

















    • Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
      – Arluin
      yesterday
















    Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
    – Arluin
    yesterday





    Combine this with SZCZERZO KŁY's star gazing answer. I'm an engineer. I like redundant systems.
    – Arluin
    yesterday











    up vote
    7
    down vote













    You look to the stars.

    And look for the Barnard' Star. And the distance from a line you setup at the moment of travel. The thing is that Barnard star travel a "pinky length" every 350 years Observing star for amateur astronomer.

    So you just measure the pinkies and approx. the time with +/- 175 years.



    you would need some more time than 5 minutes but I assure you that if you get spawned in forest prior to industrialization (and some part of modern times) even 1 day could not be enough to get to any signs of civilization.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 7




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 3




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 3




      If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
      – gerrit
      yesterday






    • 4




      @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday















    up vote
    7
    down vote













    You look to the stars.

    And look for the Barnard' Star. And the distance from a line you setup at the moment of travel. The thing is that Barnard star travel a "pinky length" every 350 years Observing star for amateur astronomer.

    So you just measure the pinkies and approx. the time with +/- 175 years.



    you would need some more time than 5 minutes but I assure you that if you get spawned in forest prior to industrialization (and some part of modern times) even 1 day could not be enough to get to any signs of civilization.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 7




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 3




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 3




      If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
      – gerrit
      yesterday






    • 4




      @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday













    up vote
    7
    down vote










    up vote
    7
    down vote









    You look to the stars.

    And look for the Barnard' Star. And the distance from a line you setup at the moment of travel. The thing is that Barnard star travel a "pinky length" every 350 years Observing star for amateur astronomer.

    So you just measure the pinkies and approx. the time with +/- 175 years.



    you would need some more time than 5 minutes but I assure you that if you get spawned in forest prior to industrialization (and some part of modern times) even 1 day could not be enough to get to any signs of civilization.






    share|improve this answer















    You look to the stars.

    And look for the Barnard' Star. And the distance from a line you setup at the moment of travel. The thing is that Barnard star travel a "pinky length" every 350 years Observing star for amateur astronomer.

    So you just measure the pinkies and approx. the time with +/- 175 years.



    you would need some more time than 5 minutes but I assure you that if you get spawned in forest prior to industrialization (and some part of modern times) even 1 day could not be enough to get to any signs of civilization.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday


























    answered yesterday









    SZCZERZO KŁY

    11.8k11336




    11.8k11336







    • 7




      Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 7




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 3




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 3




      If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
      – gerrit
      yesterday






    • 4




      @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday













    • 7




      Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 7




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday






    • 3




      @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday







    • 3




      If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
      – gerrit
      yesterday






    • 4




      @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday








    7




    7




    Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    Barnard’s Star is much too dim to see with the naked eye (magnitude 9.5), and you can’t take any equipment with you. It wasn’t even discovered until the late 19th century.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    7




    7




    @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday




    @SZCZERZOKŁY You don’t know where it should be, because as you mentioned it has a very large proper motion, and you don’t know what date it is. And you have no way to actually see it and thus verify where it is.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday




    3




    3




    @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    @SZCZERZOKŁY You can’t see the red dot. It’s very faint indeed, much to faint to see with the naked eye.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    3




    3




    If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
    – gerrit
    yesterday




    If you get spawned in a forest in England in the 16th century, you'll find farmland quickly.
    – gerrit
    yesterday




    4




    4




    @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday





    @Sumyrda Anyone who has a telescope good enough to see Barnard’s Star will certainly know what date it is, so it would be a lot easier to just ask them.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday











    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Perhaps you could look up, in both Latin and Greek if possible, a question akin to "How many years ago did Jesus Christ come to earth?" With a little convincing, and communication with any member of the church, friar, monk or priest, you would likely be able to play ignorant enough that it would seem like a naive question rather than the ramblings of a madman. Obviously, anyone with any sort of religious education would know Year A.D. = years since Jesus' birth. Would be quick and dirty, plus most of Europe would be within a few days of the nearest religious figure.



    Keep in mind, calendars change and are variable. However, the Catholic Church has been pretty solid on having at least internal consistency. If you're dealing with Catholics, Pre-1582 dates should be specified in the Julian Calendar. Since local time systems seem to be acceptable to the wizard, that should work. After 1582 it may be a little shaky, but good God-fearing Catholics will generally be on the Gregorian Calendar. Protestant Europe would be trickier, but then again, Jesus' birth would still be a good milestone, and a decent first-pass guess. Vernacular mass will be a dead giveaway if you're in Protestant country.



    Another option would be to get the basic formula of a Catholic Mass down, and pray (haha) that your period of time allows you to get to Mass. I believe Catholic Latin Mass should generally reference the name of the reigning Pope. That gives you a pretty narrow window, for most places and times. And if the mass is being held in NOT Latin, that's a pretty huge hint too.






    share|improve this answer























    • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
      – AnxiousFiend
      yesterday






    • 2




      @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday










    • @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
      – Jetpack
      5 hours ago














    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Perhaps you could look up, in both Latin and Greek if possible, a question akin to "How many years ago did Jesus Christ come to earth?" With a little convincing, and communication with any member of the church, friar, monk or priest, you would likely be able to play ignorant enough that it would seem like a naive question rather than the ramblings of a madman. Obviously, anyone with any sort of religious education would know Year A.D. = years since Jesus' birth. Would be quick and dirty, plus most of Europe would be within a few days of the nearest religious figure.



    Keep in mind, calendars change and are variable. However, the Catholic Church has been pretty solid on having at least internal consistency. If you're dealing with Catholics, Pre-1582 dates should be specified in the Julian Calendar. Since local time systems seem to be acceptable to the wizard, that should work. After 1582 it may be a little shaky, but good God-fearing Catholics will generally be on the Gregorian Calendar. Protestant Europe would be trickier, but then again, Jesus' birth would still be a good milestone, and a decent first-pass guess. Vernacular mass will be a dead giveaway if you're in Protestant country.



    Another option would be to get the basic formula of a Catholic Mass down, and pray (haha) that your period of time allows you to get to Mass. I believe Catholic Latin Mass should generally reference the name of the reigning Pope. That gives you a pretty narrow window, for most places and times. And if the mass is being held in NOT Latin, that's a pretty huge hint too.






    share|improve this answer























    • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
      – AnxiousFiend
      yesterday






    • 2




      @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday










    • @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
      – Jetpack
      5 hours ago












    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    Perhaps you could look up, in both Latin and Greek if possible, a question akin to "How many years ago did Jesus Christ come to earth?" With a little convincing, and communication with any member of the church, friar, monk or priest, you would likely be able to play ignorant enough that it would seem like a naive question rather than the ramblings of a madman. Obviously, anyone with any sort of religious education would know Year A.D. = years since Jesus' birth. Would be quick and dirty, plus most of Europe would be within a few days of the nearest religious figure.



    Keep in mind, calendars change and are variable. However, the Catholic Church has been pretty solid on having at least internal consistency. If you're dealing with Catholics, Pre-1582 dates should be specified in the Julian Calendar. Since local time systems seem to be acceptable to the wizard, that should work. After 1582 it may be a little shaky, but good God-fearing Catholics will generally be on the Gregorian Calendar. Protestant Europe would be trickier, but then again, Jesus' birth would still be a good milestone, and a decent first-pass guess. Vernacular mass will be a dead giveaway if you're in Protestant country.



    Another option would be to get the basic formula of a Catholic Mass down, and pray (haha) that your period of time allows you to get to Mass. I believe Catholic Latin Mass should generally reference the name of the reigning Pope. That gives you a pretty narrow window, for most places and times. And if the mass is being held in NOT Latin, that's a pretty huge hint too.






    share|improve this answer















    Perhaps you could look up, in both Latin and Greek if possible, a question akin to "How many years ago did Jesus Christ come to earth?" With a little convincing, and communication with any member of the church, friar, monk or priest, you would likely be able to play ignorant enough that it would seem like a naive question rather than the ramblings of a madman. Obviously, anyone with any sort of religious education would know Year A.D. = years since Jesus' birth. Would be quick and dirty, plus most of Europe would be within a few days of the nearest religious figure.



    Keep in mind, calendars change and are variable. However, the Catholic Church has been pretty solid on having at least internal consistency. If you're dealing with Catholics, Pre-1582 dates should be specified in the Julian Calendar. Since local time systems seem to be acceptable to the wizard, that should work. After 1582 it may be a little shaky, but good God-fearing Catholics will generally be on the Gregorian Calendar. Protestant Europe would be trickier, but then again, Jesus' birth would still be a good milestone, and a decent first-pass guess. Vernacular mass will be a dead giveaway if you're in Protestant country.



    Another option would be to get the basic formula of a Catholic Mass down, and pray (haha) that your period of time allows you to get to Mass. I believe Catholic Latin Mass should generally reference the name of the reigning Pope. That gives you a pretty narrow window, for most places and times. And if the mass is being held in NOT Latin, that's a pretty huge hint too.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday


























    answered yesterday









    AnxiousFiend

    813




    813











    • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
      – AnxiousFiend
      yesterday






    • 2




      @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday










    • @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
      – Jetpack
      5 hours ago
















    • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
      – AnxiousFiend
      yesterday






    • 2




      @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
      – Mike Scott
      yesterday










    • @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
      – JBH
      yesterday










    • I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
      – Jetpack
      5 hours ago















    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
    – JBH
    yesterday




    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. This is a good first answer, but it would be improved by pointing out the calendaring system has changed several times since AD0 and what we think as AD0 today isn't what someone a millennium ago would think is AD0 (though it would be a reasonable guess).
    – JBH
    yesterday












    That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
    – AnxiousFiend
    yesterday




    That's a good point. Pope would likely be more reliable! Let me add a little bit more about calendars. @JBH
    – AnxiousFiend
    yesterday




    2




    2




    @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday




    @JBH Our calendaring system doesn’t even have AD0, and never has done. It goes straight from 1BC to 1AD, with no year zero in between. That’s why the 21st century started at the beginning of 2001 rather than 2000.
    – Mike Scott
    yesterday












    @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
    – JBH
    yesterday




    @MikeScott :-) That's a good point. I was cranking out an observation and didn't put enough thought into it. Thanks for clarifying.
    – JBH
    yesterday












    I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
    – Jetpack
    5 hours ago




    I've gone to masses in languages I don't understand well, and I can attest that it's hard to pick out the name of the pope and bishop.
    – Jetpack
    5 hours ago










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Not really an answer, but if you are more than 500 or 600 years in the past, the local French or English will be hard for you to understand.



    Best case scenario, it will be easier for you to understand a drunken Quebecois or Irishman than someone speaking Middle French or Middle English. And the further you go in time the worst it will be.






    share|improve this answer























    • Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
      – Gryphon
      yesterday






    • 2




      “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
      – HopelessN00b
      yesterday














    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Not really an answer, but if you are more than 500 or 600 years in the past, the local French or English will be hard for you to understand.



    Best case scenario, it will be easier for you to understand a drunken Quebecois or Irishman than someone speaking Middle French or Middle English. And the further you go in time the worst it will be.






    share|improve this answer























    • Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
      – Gryphon
      yesterday






    • 2




      “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
      – HopelessN00b
      yesterday












    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    Not really an answer, but if you are more than 500 or 600 years in the past, the local French or English will be hard for you to understand.



    Best case scenario, it will be easier for you to understand a drunken Quebecois or Irishman than someone speaking Middle French or Middle English. And the further you go in time the worst it will be.






    share|improve this answer















    Not really an answer, but if you are more than 500 or 600 years in the past, the local French or English will be hard for you to understand.



    Best case scenario, it will be easier for you to understand a drunken Quebecois or Irishman than someone speaking Middle French or Middle English. And the further you go in time the worst it will be.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday









    L.Dutch♦

    56.1k13135264




    56.1k13135264











    answered yesterday









    Marc

    291




    291











    • Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
      – Gryphon
      yesterday






    • 2




      “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
      – HopelessN00b
      yesterday
















    • Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
      – Gryphon
      yesterday






    • 2




      “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
      – HopelessN00b
      yesterday















    Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
    – Gryphon
    yesterday




    Welcome to Worldbuilding, Marc! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox (both of which require 5 rep to post on) useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
    – Gryphon
    yesterday




    2




    2




    “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
    – HopelessN00b
    yesterday




    “You can’t, because [reason]” is a perfectly valid answer. This is not a great answer, but it is an answer. You can’t really get a good estimate of what year it is when you have no tools, and the only thing you do have (language) is going to be incomprehensible due to changes over time. (Or so this line of thinking goes. It’s even mostly right.)
    – HopelessN00b
    yesterday










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    During your minutes of prep time, look up how to write "What year is it?" in as many languages as you can think of. You already have a head start because you already know this phrase in four of the most useful languages, so you can try to learn Italian, Latin, Dutch, Portuguese, Swedish, Arabic (for the years 711 to 1492), Basque. When you land write them down as soon as you can.



    If you're allowed to bring your own paper and a pen, then this is super easy.



    The first time you see someone, you can show them the paper and try to sound out words, and give them a chance to write down the answer. If you have an informants that are familiar with one of these languages, and are patient enough to work through your strange pronunciation, spelling, and handwriting, I think this is the method that is most likely to work.



    If you can't get any understanding that way, you can start writing down "ANNO DOMINI" next to years written in Roman numerals and Arabic numerals. At this point, you're playing Charades, and I don't know how easy it is to get an answer.



    If none of these work, you can start looking for graveyards, and buildings with years written on them.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      During your minutes of prep time, look up how to write "What year is it?" in as many languages as you can think of. You already have a head start because you already know this phrase in four of the most useful languages, so you can try to learn Italian, Latin, Dutch, Portuguese, Swedish, Arabic (for the years 711 to 1492), Basque. When you land write them down as soon as you can.



      If you're allowed to bring your own paper and a pen, then this is super easy.



      The first time you see someone, you can show them the paper and try to sound out words, and give them a chance to write down the answer. If you have an informants that are familiar with one of these languages, and are patient enough to work through your strange pronunciation, spelling, and handwriting, I think this is the method that is most likely to work.



      If you can't get any understanding that way, you can start writing down "ANNO DOMINI" next to years written in Roman numerals and Arabic numerals. At this point, you're playing Charades, and I don't know how easy it is to get an answer.



      If none of these work, you can start looking for graveyards, and buildings with years written on them.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        During your minutes of prep time, look up how to write "What year is it?" in as many languages as you can think of. You already have a head start because you already know this phrase in four of the most useful languages, so you can try to learn Italian, Latin, Dutch, Portuguese, Swedish, Arabic (for the years 711 to 1492), Basque. When you land write them down as soon as you can.



        If you're allowed to bring your own paper and a pen, then this is super easy.



        The first time you see someone, you can show them the paper and try to sound out words, and give them a chance to write down the answer. If you have an informants that are familiar with one of these languages, and are patient enough to work through your strange pronunciation, spelling, and handwriting, I think this is the method that is most likely to work.



        If you can't get any understanding that way, you can start writing down "ANNO DOMINI" next to years written in Roman numerals and Arabic numerals. At this point, you're playing Charades, and I don't know how easy it is to get an answer.



        If none of these work, you can start looking for graveyards, and buildings with years written on them.






        share|improve this answer













        During your minutes of prep time, look up how to write "What year is it?" in as many languages as you can think of. You already have a head start because you already know this phrase in four of the most useful languages, so you can try to learn Italian, Latin, Dutch, Portuguese, Swedish, Arabic (for the years 711 to 1492), Basque. When you land write them down as soon as you can.



        If you're allowed to bring your own paper and a pen, then this is super easy.



        The first time you see someone, you can show them the paper and try to sound out words, and give them a chance to write down the answer. If you have an informants that are familiar with one of these languages, and are patient enough to work through your strange pronunciation, spelling, and handwriting, I think this is the method that is most likely to work.



        If you can't get any understanding that way, you can start writing down "ANNO DOMINI" next to years written in Roman numerals and Arabic numerals. At this point, you're playing Charades, and I don't know how easy it is to get an answer.



        If none of these work, you can start looking for graveyards, and buildings with years written on them.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer











        answered 5 hours ago









        Jetpack

        55126




        55126















            protected by Community♦ 13 hours ago



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?


            Popular posts from this blog

            pylint3 and pip3 broken

            Missing snmpget and snmpwalk

            How to enroll fingerprints to Ubuntu 17.10 with VFS491