GPG invalid signature on self-signed repository

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP








up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Foreword: we are using Spacewalk to distribute some internal packages to Ubuntu systems via a private repository, thus necessitating the self-signing. Unfortunately Spacewalk doesn't handle the signing portion of this yet, so it has to be done manually.



We are having issues with apt stating that signatures are invalid for the Release files::



# apt update 
Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list
Ign:1 spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu InRelease
[...]
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu Release:
The following signatures were invalid: 41CDF527725B5CD68EA405AA27D22AF72385D175


The key is imported to apt-key



# apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
--------------------
pub rsa2048 2018-03-23 [SC]
41CD F527 725B 5CD6 8EA4 05AA 27D2 2AF7 2385 D175
uid [ unknown] Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>


And the Release file is, in fact, signed with the correct key:



# gpg -k
/root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
------------------------
pub 2048R/2385D175 2018-03-23
uid Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>

# gpg ./Release.gpg
Detached signature.
Please enter name of data file: Release
gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Mar 2018 10:43:50 AM EDT using RSA key ID 2385D175
gpg: Good signature from "Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>"


What is the cause of this invalid signature error and how can we fix it? We strictly followed the instructions on http://www.devops-blog.net/spacewalk/gpg-signing-apt-repository-in-spacewalk so everything seems like it should work, but it doesn't.










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Foreword: we are using Spacewalk to distribute some internal packages to Ubuntu systems via a private repository, thus necessitating the self-signing. Unfortunately Spacewalk doesn't handle the signing portion of this yet, so it has to be done manually.



    We are having issues with apt stating that signatures are invalid for the Release files::



    # apt update 
    Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list
    Ign:1 spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu InRelease
    [...]
    Reading package lists... Done
    W: GPG error: spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu Release:
    The following signatures were invalid: 41CDF527725B5CD68EA405AA27D22AF72385D175


    The key is imported to apt-key



    # apt-key list
    /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
    --------------------
    pub rsa2048 2018-03-23 [SC]
    41CD F527 725B 5CD6 8EA4 05AA 27D2 2AF7 2385 D175
    uid [ unknown] Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>


    And the Release file is, in fact, signed with the correct key:



    # gpg -k
    /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
    ------------------------
    pub 2048R/2385D175 2018-03-23
    uid Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>

    # gpg ./Release.gpg
    Detached signature.
    Please enter name of data file: Release
    gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Mar 2018 10:43:50 AM EDT using RSA key ID 2385D175
    gpg: Good signature from "Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>"


    What is the cause of this invalid signature error and how can we fix it? We strictly followed the instructions on http://www.devops-blog.net/spacewalk/gpg-signing-apt-repository-in-spacewalk so everything seems like it should work, but it doesn't.










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Foreword: we are using Spacewalk to distribute some internal packages to Ubuntu systems via a private repository, thus necessitating the self-signing. Unfortunately Spacewalk doesn't handle the signing portion of this yet, so it has to be done manually.



      We are having issues with apt stating that signatures are invalid for the Release files::



      # apt update 
      Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list
      Ign:1 spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu InRelease
      [...]
      Reading package lists... Done
      W: GPG error: spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu Release:
      The following signatures were invalid: 41CDF527725B5CD68EA405AA27D22AF72385D175


      The key is imported to apt-key



      # apt-key list
      /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
      --------------------
      pub rsa2048 2018-03-23 [SC]
      41CD F527 725B 5CD6 8EA4 05AA 27D2 2AF7 2385 D175
      uid [ unknown] Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>


      And the Release file is, in fact, signed with the correct key:



      # gpg -k
      /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
      ------------------------
      pub 2048R/2385D175 2018-03-23
      uid Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>

      # gpg ./Release.gpg
      Detached signature.
      Please enter name of data file: Release
      gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Mar 2018 10:43:50 AM EDT using RSA key ID 2385D175
      gpg: Good signature from "Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>"


      What is the cause of this invalid signature error and how can we fix it? We strictly followed the instructions on http://www.devops-blog.net/spacewalk/gpg-signing-apt-repository-in-spacewalk so everything seems like it should work, but it doesn't.










      share|improve this question













      Foreword: we are using Spacewalk to distribute some internal packages to Ubuntu systems via a private repository, thus necessitating the self-signing. Unfortunately Spacewalk doesn't handle the signing portion of this yet, so it has to be done manually.



      We are having issues with apt stating that signatures are invalid for the Release files::



      # apt update 
      Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list
      Ign:1 spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu InRelease
      [...]
      Reading package lists... Done
      W: GPG error: spacewalk://spacewalk.server extras-ubuntu Release:
      The following signatures were invalid: 41CDF527725B5CD68EA405AA27D22AF72385D175


      The key is imported to apt-key



      # apt-key list
      /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
      --------------------
      pub rsa2048 2018-03-23 [SC]
      41CD F527 725B 5CD6 8EA4 05AA 27D2 2AF7 2385 D175
      uid [ unknown] Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>


      And the Release file is, in fact, signed with the correct key:



      # gpg -k
      /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
      ------------------------
      pub 2048R/2385D175 2018-03-23
      uid Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>

      # gpg ./Release.gpg
      Detached signature.
      Please enter name of data file: Release
      gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Mar 2018 10:43:50 AM EDT using RSA key ID 2385D175
      gpg: Good signature from "Spacewalk (For GPG signing APT repos) <nobody@nowhere>"


      What is the cause of this invalid signature error and how can we fix it? We strictly followed the instructions on http://www.devops-blog.net/spacewalk/gpg-signing-apt-repository-in-spacewalk so everything seems like it should work, but it doesn't.







      apt gnupg






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 23 at 15:06









      ngst

      11




      11

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1018585%2fgpg-invalid-signature-on-self-signed-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1018585%2fgpg-invalid-signature-on-self-signed-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Which professions warranted travel in Medieval times?

          Trouble downloading packages list due to a “Hash sum mismatch” error

          How do so many people here on Academia.SE, and in general, afford lavish higher education programs?