Why use combined characters that have the same meaning?
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO9GURib1T8z7lCwjOGLQaGtrueEthgQ8LO42ZX8cOfTqDK4jvDDpKkLFwf2J49kYCMNW7d4ABih_XCb_2UXdq5fPJDkoyg7-8g_YfRUot-XnaXkNYycsNp7lA5_TW9td0FFpLQ2APzKcZ/s1600/1.jpg)
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYQ0N5W1qAOxLP7t7iOM6O6AzbZnkXUy16s7P_CWfOb5UbTQY_aDsc727chyphenhyphen5W4IppVNernMMQeaUFTB_rFzAd95_CDt-tnwN-nBx6JyUp2duGjPaL5-VgNO41AVsA_vu30EJcipdDG409/s400/Clash+Royale+CLAN+TAG%2523URR8PPP.png)
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
(rèn shà) both characters means ( to know)and when combined it still have the same meaning.
So why can't I use only one of them ?
translation grammar meaning characters
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
(rèn shà) both characters means ( to know)and when combined it still have the same meaning.
So why can't I use only one of them ?
translation grammar meaning characters
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
(rèn shà) both characters means ( to know)and when combined it still have the same meaning.
So why can't I use only one of them ?
translation grammar meaning characters
(rèn shà) both characters means ( to know)and when combined it still have the same meaning.
So why can't I use only one of them ?
translation grammar meaning characters
translation grammar meaning characters
asked Aug 8 at 5:09
Jenin Hope
211
211
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56
add a comment |Â
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56
add a comment |Â
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Mandarin has a lot of two-character words, where both of the characters mean almost the same thing. This seems surprising, but makes sense when you see how the language developed over time. Old Chinese (spoken over two thousand years ago) had a lot more sounds than Modern Mandarin, and over time, many sounds were lost. This isn't obvious from Chinese characters (which don't record individual sounds), but this fact has been established based on ancient Chinese dictionaries (often called "rime books"), as well as modern linguistic research. However, after the sounds were lost, many syllables which used to sound different ended up sounding the same. To avoid confusion, people starting combining two syllables, to make themselves clear.
For example, rènshi (simplified: 认è¯Â, traditional: èªÂèÂÂ) is composed of two syllables, both of which come from Old Chinese. They were pronounced something like "nÃÂns" and "ÃÂk" (where "ÃÂ" is like the "a" in "comma"). We can compare this with other characters that are pronounced the same in Modern Mandarin. For example, ä»» is also pronounced "rèn", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "nÃÂms", not "nÃÂns". Meanwhile, å is also pronounced "shÃÂ", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "gip", not "ÃÂk". By combining the two syllables, rènshi is easier to understand, because it can't be confused with other words. These two-character words have now been used for centuries, and in some cases, the individual characters would not be used on their own.
As a second example (from this question), we can look at shuìjiào (simplified: ç¡è§Â, traditional: ç¡覺). Both characters come from Old Chinese, and were pronounced "doih" and "krûks". In contrast, ç¨Â/稠is also pronounced "shuì", but in Old Chinese, it was "lhots", not "doih". Similarly, è¾Â/è¼ is also pronounced "jiào", but in Old Chinese, it was "krâuk", not "krûks".
I have taken these pronunciations from the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. If you want to search for other words, click "All" underneath "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", type your words in the box at the top (in traditional characters), and then click the "Display Phonetics" button on the left. If a character didn't exist in Old Chinese, it won't come up! For example, è¹æÂÂ/èÂÂæ comes from Sanskrit, and came into Chinese around the same time as Buddhism came into China.
If you would like to read more about how Chinese has developed two-syllable words, you can have a look at this academic paper, which was linked in this answer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Sometimes they are used by themselves (it depends on the word), e.g.:
ä½ è½帮å©æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
ä½ è½帮æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
Can you help me?
They're often used in single-character forms in Chinese idioms, e.g. å Â亲ä¸Â认 and ä¸Âè¯Âæ¶å¡.
In my (only a learner) experience, the main reason seems to be that it's hard to understand sentences with single-character words:
认 and ä»» are pronounced the same, and 诠is pronounced the same as æ¶, å®Â, and Ã¥ÂÂ, so it's harder to deduce which character is being spoken.
认 and 诠also combine with other Chinese characters, e.g. 认为 and çÂ¥è¯Â, so it's harder to distinguish where word boundaries occur.
But on top of this, the usage of the double-character word may be different. An example of this is 帮忠which is a noun for "help", whereas 帮 is a verb for "help". Another example is:
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Just now, I ate.
But Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ饠is not correct (because å is an adverb). So if we arbitrarily interchange å and Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂ, we will break the grammar.
Also, the English is only an approximate translation, and in Chinese these words that translate to the same thing are slightly different. They're the closest we have to the underlying meanings of 认è¯Â, 认, and è¯Â.
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
It sources back to ancient times in China when spoken and written languages are in different forms (after Qin). Back then, only a small portion of Chinese people know how to write, while most Chinese people can only speak.
During the development of the Chinese language, written language became closer and closer to spoken language, transforming from WenYanï¼ÂæÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂï¼ to BaiHua ï¼Âç½è¯Âï¼Â. In spoken language, people like to use bi-syllable words because it is easier to understand since there're many homophones. So written language inherit this pattern during its development.
In modern Chinese, people are used to this kind of expression, so it seems outdated or 'show off your WenYan skills' when you only use one character to express its meaning. Also, there're fixed rules that you must follow because of habits. However, you can still found some traces of ancient Chinese usage in Cantonese. I can't give an example here because I'm not an expert of Cantonese.
The evolution of BaiHua can be found on this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_vernacular_Chinese
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Please read this post: 认诠vs çÂ¥é based on glyph origins
Both 认 and 诠has other meanings beside "recognize", just using 认 or just using 诠might mean something other than "recognize".
Put them together to form a specific term can remove ambiguity.
The reason for coining compound words is to turn general characters into specific words
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the same reason you say "come back" instead of just "back" - it's just how the language is.
Or, even more comically, you wouldn't say "pro" instead of "protrude" in English, why require such brevity from modern Chinese?
Modern Chinese likes bi-syllabic "words", if you want each character to be used for one separate "word", look into æÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂ.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
See Sections 5-6 of this paper for theories of how compounding and disyllabicization occurred together in Chinese. There is a long history.
add a comment |Â
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Mandarin has a lot of two-character words, where both of the characters mean almost the same thing. This seems surprising, but makes sense when you see how the language developed over time. Old Chinese (spoken over two thousand years ago) had a lot more sounds than Modern Mandarin, and over time, many sounds were lost. This isn't obvious from Chinese characters (which don't record individual sounds), but this fact has been established based on ancient Chinese dictionaries (often called "rime books"), as well as modern linguistic research. However, after the sounds were lost, many syllables which used to sound different ended up sounding the same. To avoid confusion, people starting combining two syllables, to make themselves clear.
For example, rènshi (simplified: 认è¯Â, traditional: èªÂèÂÂ) is composed of two syllables, both of which come from Old Chinese. They were pronounced something like "nÃÂns" and "ÃÂk" (where "ÃÂ" is like the "a" in "comma"). We can compare this with other characters that are pronounced the same in Modern Mandarin. For example, ä»» is also pronounced "rèn", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "nÃÂms", not "nÃÂns". Meanwhile, å is also pronounced "shÃÂ", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "gip", not "ÃÂk". By combining the two syllables, rènshi is easier to understand, because it can't be confused with other words. These two-character words have now been used for centuries, and in some cases, the individual characters would not be used on their own.
As a second example (from this question), we can look at shuìjiào (simplified: ç¡è§Â, traditional: ç¡覺). Both characters come from Old Chinese, and were pronounced "doih" and "krûks". In contrast, ç¨Â/稠is also pronounced "shuì", but in Old Chinese, it was "lhots", not "doih". Similarly, è¾Â/è¼ is also pronounced "jiào", but in Old Chinese, it was "krâuk", not "krûks".
I have taken these pronunciations from the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. If you want to search for other words, click "All" underneath "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", type your words in the box at the top (in traditional characters), and then click the "Display Phonetics" button on the left. If a character didn't exist in Old Chinese, it won't come up! For example, è¹æÂÂ/èÂÂæ comes from Sanskrit, and came into Chinese around the same time as Buddhism came into China.
If you would like to read more about how Chinese has developed two-syllable words, you can have a look at this academic paper, which was linked in this answer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Mandarin has a lot of two-character words, where both of the characters mean almost the same thing. This seems surprising, but makes sense when you see how the language developed over time. Old Chinese (spoken over two thousand years ago) had a lot more sounds than Modern Mandarin, and over time, many sounds were lost. This isn't obvious from Chinese characters (which don't record individual sounds), but this fact has been established based on ancient Chinese dictionaries (often called "rime books"), as well as modern linguistic research. However, after the sounds were lost, many syllables which used to sound different ended up sounding the same. To avoid confusion, people starting combining two syllables, to make themselves clear.
For example, rènshi (simplified: 认è¯Â, traditional: èªÂèÂÂ) is composed of two syllables, both of which come from Old Chinese. They were pronounced something like "nÃÂns" and "ÃÂk" (where "ÃÂ" is like the "a" in "comma"). We can compare this with other characters that are pronounced the same in Modern Mandarin. For example, ä»» is also pronounced "rèn", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "nÃÂms", not "nÃÂns". Meanwhile, å is also pronounced "shÃÂ", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "gip", not "ÃÂk". By combining the two syllables, rènshi is easier to understand, because it can't be confused with other words. These two-character words have now been used for centuries, and in some cases, the individual characters would not be used on their own.
As a second example (from this question), we can look at shuìjiào (simplified: ç¡è§Â, traditional: ç¡覺). Both characters come from Old Chinese, and were pronounced "doih" and "krûks". In contrast, ç¨Â/稠is also pronounced "shuì", but in Old Chinese, it was "lhots", not "doih". Similarly, è¾Â/è¼ is also pronounced "jiào", but in Old Chinese, it was "krâuk", not "krûks".
I have taken these pronunciations from the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. If you want to search for other words, click "All" underneath "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", type your words in the box at the top (in traditional characters), and then click the "Display Phonetics" button on the left. If a character didn't exist in Old Chinese, it won't come up! For example, è¹æÂÂ/èÂÂæ comes from Sanskrit, and came into Chinese around the same time as Buddhism came into China.
If you would like to read more about how Chinese has developed two-syllable words, you can have a look at this academic paper, which was linked in this answer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Mandarin has a lot of two-character words, where both of the characters mean almost the same thing. This seems surprising, but makes sense when you see how the language developed over time. Old Chinese (spoken over two thousand years ago) had a lot more sounds than Modern Mandarin, and over time, many sounds were lost. This isn't obvious from Chinese characters (which don't record individual sounds), but this fact has been established based on ancient Chinese dictionaries (often called "rime books"), as well as modern linguistic research. However, after the sounds were lost, many syllables which used to sound different ended up sounding the same. To avoid confusion, people starting combining two syllables, to make themselves clear.
For example, rènshi (simplified: 认è¯Â, traditional: èªÂèÂÂ) is composed of two syllables, both of which come from Old Chinese. They were pronounced something like "nÃÂns" and "ÃÂk" (where "ÃÂ" is like the "a" in "comma"). We can compare this with other characters that are pronounced the same in Modern Mandarin. For example, ä»» is also pronounced "rèn", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "nÃÂms", not "nÃÂns". Meanwhile, å is also pronounced "shÃÂ", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "gip", not "ÃÂk". By combining the two syllables, rènshi is easier to understand, because it can't be confused with other words. These two-character words have now been used for centuries, and in some cases, the individual characters would not be used on their own.
As a second example (from this question), we can look at shuìjiào (simplified: ç¡è§Â, traditional: ç¡覺). Both characters come from Old Chinese, and were pronounced "doih" and "krûks". In contrast, ç¨Â/稠is also pronounced "shuì", but in Old Chinese, it was "lhots", not "doih". Similarly, è¾Â/è¼ is also pronounced "jiào", but in Old Chinese, it was "krâuk", not "krûks".
I have taken these pronunciations from the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. If you want to search for other words, click "All" underneath "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", type your words in the box at the top (in traditional characters), and then click the "Display Phonetics" button on the left. If a character didn't exist in Old Chinese, it won't come up! For example, è¹æÂÂ/èÂÂæ comes from Sanskrit, and came into Chinese around the same time as Buddhism came into China.
If you would like to read more about how Chinese has developed two-syllable words, you can have a look at this academic paper, which was linked in this answer.
Mandarin has a lot of two-character words, where both of the characters mean almost the same thing. This seems surprising, but makes sense when you see how the language developed over time. Old Chinese (spoken over two thousand years ago) had a lot more sounds than Modern Mandarin, and over time, many sounds were lost. This isn't obvious from Chinese characters (which don't record individual sounds), but this fact has been established based on ancient Chinese dictionaries (often called "rime books"), as well as modern linguistic research. However, after the sounds were lost, many syllables which used to sound different ended up sounding the same. To avoid confusion, people starting combining two syllables, to make themselves clear.
For example, rènshi (simplified: 认è¯Â, traditional: èªÂèÂÂ) is composed of two syllables, both of which come from Old Chinese. They were pronounced something like "nÃÂns" and "ÃÂk" (where "ÃÂ" is like the "a" in "comma"). We can compare this with other characters that are pronounced the same in Modern Mandarin. For example, ä»» is also pronounced "rèn", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "nÃÂms", not "nÃÂns". Meanwhile, å is also pronounced "shÃÂ", but in Old Chinese, it was pronounced "gip", not "ÃÂk". By combining the two syllables, rènshi is easier to understand, because it can't be confused with other words. These two-character words have now been used for centuries, and in some cases, the individual characters would not be used on their own.
As a second example (from this question), we can look at shuìjiào (simplified: ç¡è§Â, traditional: ç¡覺). Both characters come from Old Chinese, and were pronounced "doih" and "krûks". In contrast, ç¨Â/稠is also pronounced "shuì", but in Old Chinese, it was "lhots", not "doih". Similarly, è¾Â/è¼ is also pronounced "jiào", but in Old Chinese, it was "krâuk", not "krûks".
I have taken these pronunciations from the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. If you want to search for other words, click "All" underneath "ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", type your words in the box at the top (in traditional characters), and then click the "Display Phonetics" button on the left. If a character didn't exist in Old Chinese, it won't come up! For example, è¹æÂÂ/èÂÂæ comes from Sanskrit, and came into Chinese around the same time as Buddhism came into China.
If you would like to read more about how Chinese has developed two-syllable words, you can have a look at this academic paper, which was linked in this answer.
edited Sep 3 at 15:41
answered Sep 3 at 11:10
eaglebrain
1315
1315
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Sometimes they are used by themselves (it depends on the word), e.g.:
ä½ è½帮å©æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
ä½ è½帮æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
Can you help me?
They're often used in single-character forms in Chinese idioms, e.g. å Â亲ä¸Â认 and ä¸Âè¯Âæ¶å¡.
In my (only a learner) experience, the main reason seems to be that it's hard to understand sentences with single-character words:
认 and ä»» are pronounced the same, and 诠is pronounced the same as æ¶, å®Â, and Ã¥ÂÂ, so it's harder to deduce which character is being spoken.
认 and 诠also combine with other Chinese characters, e.g. 认为 and çÂ¥è¯Â, so it's harder to distinguish where word boundaries occur.
But on top of this, the usage of the double-character word may be different. An example of this is 帮忠which is a noun for "help", whereas 帮 is a verb for "help". Another example is:
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Just now, I ate.
But Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ饠is not correct (because å is an adverb). So if we arbitrarily interchange å and Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂ, we will break the grammar.
Also, the English is only an approximate translation, and in Chinese these words that translate to the same thing are slightly different. They're the closest we have to the underlying meanings of 认è¯Â, 认, and è¯Â.
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Sometimes they are used by themselves (it depends on the word), e.g.:
ä½ è½帮å©æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
ä½ è½帮æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
Can you help me?
They're often used in single-character forms in Chinese idioms, e.g. å Â亲ä¸Â认 and ä¸Âè¯Âæ¶å¡.
In my (only a learner) experience, the main reason seems to be that it's hard to understand sentences with single-character words:
认 and ä»» are pronounced the same, and 诠is pronounced the same as æ¶, å®Â, and Ã¥ÂÂ, so it's harder to deduce which character is being spoken.
认 and 诠also combine with other Chinese characters, e.g. 认为 and çÂ¥è¯Â, so it's harder to distinguish where word boundaries occur.
But on top of this, the usage of the double-character word may be different. An example of this is 帮忠which is a noun for "help", whereas 帮 is a verb for "help". Another example is:
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Just now, I ate.
But Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ饠is not correct (because å is an adverb). So if we arbitrarily interchange å and Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂ, we will break the grammar.
Also, the English is only an approximate translation, and in Chinese these words that translate to the same thing are slightly different. They're the closest we have to the underlying meanings of 认è¯Â, 认, and è¯Â.
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Sometimes they are used by themselves (it depends on the word), e.g.:
ä½ è½帮å©æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
ä½ è½帮æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
Can you help me?
They're often used in single-character forms in Chinese idioms, e.g. å Â亲ä¸Â认 and ä¸Âè¯Âæ¶å¡.
In my (only a learner) experience, the main reason seems to be that it's hard to understand sentences with single-character words:
认 and ä»» are pronounced the same, and 诠is pronounced the same as æ¶, å®Â, and Ã¥ÂÂ, so it's harder to deduce which character is being spoken.
认 and 诠also combine with other Chinese characters, e.g. 认为 and çÂ¥è¯Â, so it's harder to distinguish where word boundaries occur.
But on top of this, the usage of the double-character word may be different. An example of this is 帮忠which is a noun for "help", whereas 帮 is a verb for "help". Another example is:
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Just now, I ate.
But Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ饠is not correct (because å is an adverb). So if we arbitrarily interchange å and Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂ, we will break the grammar.
Also, the English is only an approximate translation, and in Chinese these words that translate to the same thing are slightly different. They're the closest we have to the underlying meanings of 认è¯Â, 认, and è¯Â.
Sometimes they are used by themselves (it depends on the word), e.g.:
ä½ è½帮å©æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
ä½ è½帮æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂï¼Â
Can you help me?
They're often used in single-character forms in Chinese idioms, e.g. å Â亲ä¸Â认 and ä¸Âè¯Âæ¶å¡.
In my (only a learner) experience, the main reason seems to be that it's hard to understand sentences with single-character words:
认 and ä»» are pronounced the same, and 诠is pronounced the same as æ¶, å®Â, and Ã¥ÂÂ, so it's harder to deduce which character is being spoken.
认 and 诠also combine with other Chinese characters, e.g. 认为 and çÂ¥è¯Â, so it's harder to distinguish where word boundaries occur.
But on top of this, the usage of the double-character word may be different. An example of this is 帮忠which is a noun for "help", whereas 帮 is a verb for "help". Another example is:
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂé¥ÂãÂÂ
Just now, I ate.
But Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ饠is not correct (because å is an adverb). So if we arbitrarily interchange å and Ã¥ÂÂæÂÂ, we will break the grammar.
Also, the English is only an approximate translation, and in Chinese these words that translate to the same thing are slightly different. They're the closest we have to the underlying meanings of 认è¯Â, 认, and è¯Â.
answered Aug 8 at 6:30
Becky æÂÂèÂÂ
2,1961842
2,1961842
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
add a comment |Â
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
1
1
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
The å and Ã¥ÂÂæ examples are nice to show that you can't replace the two-character word with a single character -- but the explanation isn't quite right, because Ã¥ÂÂæ is also an adverb. It would be better to say that å and Ã¥ÂÂæ are different types of adverb, which follow different grammatical rules.
â eaglebrain
Sep 3 at 15:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
It sources back to ancient times in China when spoken and written languages are in different forms (after Qin). Back then, only a small portion of Chinese people know how to write, while most Chinese people can only speak.
During the development of the Chinese language, written language became closer and closer to spoken language, transforming from WenYanï¼ÂæÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂï¼ to BaiHua ï¼Âç½è¯Âï¼Â. In spoken language, people like to use bi-syllable words because it is easier to understand since there're many homophones. So written language inherit this pattern during its development.
In modern Chinese, people are used to this kind of expression, so it seems outdated or 'show off your WenYan skills' when you only use one character to express its meaning. Also, there're fixed rules that you must follow because of habits. However, you can still found some traces of ancient Chinese usage in Cantonese. I can't give an example here because I'm not an expert of Cantonese.
The evolution of BaiHua can be found on this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_vernacular_Chinese
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
It sources back to ancient times in China when spoken and written languages are in different forms (after Qin). Back then, only a small portion of Chinese people know how to write, while most Chinese people can only speak.
During the development of the Chinese language, written language became closer and closer to spoken language, transforming from WenYanï¼ÂæÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂï¼ to BaiHua ï¼Âç½è¯Âï¼Â. In spoken language, people like to use bi-syllable words because it is easier to understand since there're many homophones. So written language inherit this pattern during its development.
In modern Chinese, people are used to this kind of expression, so it seems outdated or 'show off your WenYan skills' when you only use one character to express its meaning. Also, there're fixed rules that you must follow because of habits. However, you can still found some traces of ancient Chinese usage in Cantonese. I can't give an example here because I'm not an expert of Cantonese.
The evolution of BaiHua can be found on this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_vernacular_Chinese
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
It sources back to ancient times in China when spoken and written languages are in different forms (after Qin). Back then, only a small portion of Chinese people know how to write, while most Chinese people can only speak.
During the development of the Chinese language, written language became closer and closer to spoken language, transforming from WenYanï¼ÂæÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂï¼ to BaiHua ï¼Âç½è¯Âï¼Â. In spoken language, people like to use bi-syllable words because it is easier to understand since there're many homophones. So written language inherit this pattern during its development.
In modern Chinese, people are used to this kind of expression, so it seems outdated or 'show off your WenYan skills' when you only use one character to express its meaning. Also, there're fixed rules that you must follow because of habits. However, you can still found some traces of ancient Chinese usage in Cantonese. I can't give an example here because I'm not an expert of Cantonese.
The evolution of BaiHua can be found on this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_vernacular_Chinese
It sources back to ancient times in China when spoken and written languages are in different forms (after Qin). Back then, only a small portion of Chinese people know how to write, while most Chinese people can only speak.
During the development of the Chinese language, written language became closer and closer to spoken language, transforming from WenYanï¼ÂæÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂï¼ to BaiHua ï¼Âç½è¯Âï¼Â. In spoken language, people like to use bi-syllable words because it is easier to understand since there're many homophones. So written language inherit this pattern during its development.
In modern Chinese, people are used to this kind of expression, so it seems outdated or 'show off your WenYan skills' when you only use one character to express its meaning. Also, there're fixed rules that you must follow because of habits. However, you can still found some traces of ancient Chinese usage in Cantonese. I can't give an example here because I'm not an expert of Cantonese.
The evolution of BaiHua can be found on this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Written_vernacular_Chinese
edited Aug 9 at 5:47
answered Aug 9 at 5:36
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/tmOvh.gif?s=32&g=1)
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/tmOvh.gif?s=32&g=1)
Kevin. Fang
2545
2545
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Please read this post: 认诠vs çÂ¥é based on glyph origins
Both 认 and 诠has other meanings beside "recognize", just using 认 or just using 诠might mean something other than "recognize".
Put them together to form a specific term can remove ambiguity.
The reason for coining compound words is to turn general characters into specific words
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Please read this post: 认诠vs çÂ¥é based on glyph origins
Both 认 and 诠has other meanings beside "recognize", just using 认 or just using 诠might mean something other than "recognize".
Put them together to form a specific term can remove ambiguity.
The reason for coining compound words is to turn general characters into specific words
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Please read this post: 认诠vs çÂ¥é based on glyph origins
Both 认 and 诠has other meanings beside "recognize", just using 认 or just using 诠might mean something other than "recognize".
Put them together to form a specific term can remove ambiguity.
The reason for coining compound words is to turn general characters into specific words
Please read this post: 认诠vs çÂ¥é based on glyph origins
Both 认 and 诠has other meanings beside "recognize", just using 认 or just using 诠might mean something other than "recognize".
Put them together to form a specific term can remove ambiguity.
The reason for coining compound words is to turn general characters into specific words
answered Aug 8 at 6:03
Tang Ho
23.4k1437
23.4k1437
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the same reason you say "come back" instead of just "back" - it's just how the language is.
Or, even more comically, you wouldn't say "pro" instead of "protrude" in English, why require such brevity from modern Chinese?
Modern Chinese likes bi-syllabic "words", if you want each character to be used for one separate "word", look into æÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂ.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the same reason you say "come back" instead of just "back" - it's just how the language is.
Or, even more comically, you wouldn't say "pro" instead of "protrude" in English, why require such brevity from modern Chinese?
Modern Chinese likes bi-syllabic "words", if you want each character to be used for one separate "word", look into æÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂ.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
For the same reason you say "come back" instead of just "back" - it's just how the language is.
Or, even more comically, you wouldn't say "pro" instead of "protrude" in English, why require such brevity from modern Chinese?
Modern Chinese likes bi-syllabic "words", if you want each character to be used for one separate "word", look into æÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂ.
For the same reason you say "come back" instead of just "back" - it's just how the language is.
Or, even more comically, you wouldn't say "pro" instead of "protrude" in English, why require such brevity from modern Chinese?
Modern Chinese likes bi-syllabic "words", if you want each character to be used for one separate "word", look into æÂÂè¨ÂæÂÂ.
answered Aug 9 at 3:56
Vitaly Osipov
518210
518210
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
See Sections 5-6 of this paper for theories of how compounding and disyllabicization occurred together in Chinese. There is a long history.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
See Sections 5-6 of this paper for theories of how compounding and disyllabicization occurred together in Chinese. There is a long history.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
See Sections 5-6 of this paper for theories of how compounding and disyllabicization occurred together in Chinese. There is a long history.
See Sections 5-6 of this paper for theories of how compounding and disyllabicization occurred together in Chinese. There is a long history.
answered Aug 9 at 22:33
Nimrod
2846
2846
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31011%2fwhy-use-combined-characters-that-have-the-same-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Something related to å°Âä»Â(å°Âå¶).
â NoobTW
Aug 8 at 5:56