Why is “boot-repair” listed twice in the ubuntu documentation?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP








up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I'm new to Ubuntu and I'm going through the official documentation. Can someone explain why the command sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair && boot-repair lists "boot-repair" twice?



Seen here in this image.










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
    – Baldrickk
    Feb 20 at 11:57














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I'm new to Ubuntu and I'm going through the official documentation. Can someone explain why the command sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair && boot-repair lists "boot-repair" twice?



Seen here in this image.










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
    – Baldrickk
    Feb 20 at 11:57












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I'm new to Ubuntu and I'm going through the official documentation. Can someone explain why the command sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair && boot-repair lists "boot-repair" twice?



Seen here in this image.










share|improve this question













I'm new to Ubuntu and I'm going through the official documentation. Can someone explain why the command sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair && boot-repair lists "boot-repair" twice?



Seen here in this image.







boot-repair






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 20 at 1:32









Gabriel Fair

98115




98115







  • 2




    Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
    – Baldrickk
    Feb 20 at 11:57












  • 2




    Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
    – Baldrickk
    Feb 20 at 11:57







2




2




Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
– Baldrickk
Feb 20 at 11:57




Obviously because boot-repair is twice as important as the other commands (joke)
– Baldrickk
Feb 20 at 11:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










The last line contains two commands.



The first part installs boot-repair. (sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair)



The "&&" characters is a delimiter like ";" is, however its conditional on success, ie. the command following it is only to be run IF the first command had no errors.



The 'second' boot-repair is the one that runs it.






share|improve this answer




















  • If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
    – guiverc
    Feb 20 at 1:40







  • 1




    oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
    – Gabriel Fair
    Feb 20 at 1:50










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1007878%2fwhy-is-boot-repair-listed-twice-in-the-ubuntu-documentation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
12
down vote



accepted










The last line contains two commands.



The first part installs boot-repair. (sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair)



The "&&" characters is a delimiter like ";" is, however its conditional on success, ie. the command following it is only to be run IF the first command had no errors.



The 'second' boot-repair is the one that runs it.






share|improve this answer




















  • If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
    – guiverc
    Feb 20 at 1:40







  • 1




    oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
    – Gabriel Fair
    Feb 20 at 1:50














up vote
12
down vote



accepted










The last line contains two commands.



The first part installs boot-repair. (sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair)



The "&&" characters is a delimiter like ";" is, however its conditional on success, ie. the command following it is only to be run IF the first command had no errors.



The 'second' boot-repair is the one that runs it.






share|improve this answer




















  • If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
    – guiverc
    Feb 20 at 1:40







  • 1




    oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
    – Gabriel Fair
    Feb 20 at 1:50












up vote
12
down vote



accepted







up vote
12
down vote



accepted






The last line contains two commands.



The first part installs boot-repair. (sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair)



The "&&" characters is a delimiter like ";" is, however its conditional on success, ie. the command following it is only to be run IF the first command had no errors.



The 'second' boot-repair is the one that runs it.






share|improve this answer












The last line contains two commands.



The first part installs boot-repair. (sudo apt-get install -y boot-repair)



The "&&" characters is a delimiter like ";" is, however its conditional on success, ie. the command following it is only to be run IF the first command had no errors.



The 'second' boot-repair is the one that runs it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 20 at 1:36









guiverc

3,72811422




3,72811422











  • If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
    – guiverc
    Feb 20 at 1:40







  • 1




    oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
    – Gabriel Fair
    Feb 20 at 1:50
















  • If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
    – guiverc
    Feb 20 at 1:40







  • 1




    oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
    – Gabriel Fair
    Feb 20 at 1:50















If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
– guiverc
Feb 20 at 1:40





If you used a ";" and the install command worked; the result would be the same as it'd install, then run. If however the install failed you'd get errors for the install failing, followed by more errors as boot-repair couldn't be found... The && conditional parameters reduces the errors (if they occur) as they [errors] can scare users (what did i do wrong? did i break it?..)
– guiverc
Feb 20 at 1:40





1




1




oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
– Gabriel Fair
Feb 20 at 1:50




oh of course, that makes sense. Thank you. I was thinking that it was trying to install it twice.
– Gabriel Fair
Feb 20 at 1:50

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1007878%2fwhy-is-boot-repair-listed-twice-in-the-ubuntu-documentation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

Which professions warranted travel in Medieval times?

How do so many people here on Academia.SE, and in general, afford lavish higher education programs?

Trouble downloading packages list due to a “Hash sum mismatch” error