signatured module seems required even if secure boot disabled

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP








up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The latest kernel Ubuntu 14.04 64bit 3.13.0-143-generic won't let vmware workstation player 12.5.9 start.



This is caused by vmmon,vmnet modules are not loaded seemingly due to 'secure boot' prevents unsigned modules from loading.



My PC has older CPU(C2D) and BIOS does not have UEFI, so I think Secure boot is disabled by default on this machine.
I searched in dmesg for 'Secure boot' words and confirmed none.h



Vmware workstation player works just fine on the previous kernel.



Has anyone run into the same problem?










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    The latest kernel Ubuntu 14.04 64bit 3.13.0-143-generic won't let vmware workstation player 12.5.9 start.



    This is caused by vmmon,vmnet modules are not loaded seemingly due to 'secure boot' prevents unsigned modules from loading.



    My PC has older CPU(C2D) and BIOS does not have UEFI, so I think Secure boot is disabled by default on this machine.
    I searched in dmesg for 'Secure boot' words and confirmed none.h



    Vmware workstation player works just fine on the previous kernel.



    Has anyone run into the same problem?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      The latest kernel Ubuntu 14.04 64bit 3.13.0-143-generic won't let vmware workstation player 12.5.9 start.



      This is caused by vmmon,vmnet modules are not loaded seemingly due to 'secure boot' prevents unsigned modules from loading.



      My PC has older CPU(C2D) and BIOS does not have UEFI, so I think Secure boot is disabled by default on this machine.
      I searched in dmesg for 'Secure boot' words and confirmed none.h



      Vmware workstation player works just fine on the previous kernel.



      Has anyone run into the same problem?










      share|improve this question















      The latest kernel Ubuntu 14.04 64bit 3.13.0-143-generic won't let vmware workstation player 12.5.9 start.



      This is caused by vmmon,vmnet modules are not loaded seemingly due to 'secure boot' prevents unsigned modules from loading.



      My PC has older CPU(C2D) and BIOS does not have UEFI, so I think Secure boot is disabled by default on this machine.
      I searched in dmesg for 'Secure boot' words and confirmed none.h



      Vmware workstation player works just fine on the previous kernel.



      Has anyone run into the same problem?







      14.04 kernel secure-boot vmware-player






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 12 at 4:42

























      asked Mar 12 at 4:26









      yochi

      12




      12

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1014038%2fsignatured-module-seems-required-even-if-secure-boot-disabled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1014038%2fsignatured-module-seems-required-even-if-secure-boot-disabled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How do so many people here on Academia.SE, and in general, afford lavish higher education programs?

          Trouble downloading packages list due to a “Hash sum mismatch” error

          How do I move numbers in filenames, in a batch renaming operation?