netplan configuration on Ubuntu 17.04 virtual machine
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO9GURib1T8z7lCwjOGLQaGtrueEthgQ8LO42ZX8cOfTqDK4jvDDpKkLFwf2J49kYCMNW7d4ABih_XCb_2UXdq5fPJDkoyg7-8g_YfRUot-XnaXkNYycsNp7lA5_TW9td0FFpLQ2APzKcZ/s1600/1.jpg)
![Creative The name of the picture](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYQ0N5W1qAOxLP7t7iOM6O6AzbZnkXUy16s7P_CWfOb5UbTQY_aDsc727chyphenhyphen5W4IppVNernMMQeaUFTB_rFzAd95_CDt-tnwN-nBx6JyUp2duGjPaL5-VgNO41AVsA_vu30EJcipdDG409/s400/Clash+Royale+CLAN+TAG%2523URR8PPP.png)
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm running VirtualBox with 2 network adapters: standard NAT (enp0s3) and a Host-only Adapter (enp0s8). I use the NAT to access the internet and the Host-only Adapter to SSH in from my local machine.
The box boots up with both adapters enabled, both have IP addresses, everything looking good.
I can SSH into this box over the host-only adapter, no issues there. But I can't get on the internet with it. However, if I disable the host-only adapter, then I can access the internet (but obviously I can no longer SSH into it over the local tunnel).
And finally, here is my netplan yaml config:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s3:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
enp0s8:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.52.101/24]
gateway4: 192.168.52.101
Any ideas? It seems like maybe all my outbound traffic is routing through the host-only adapter somehow.
Edit: attaching the output of ip route list
in case it helps.
default via 192.168.52.101 dev enp0s8 proto static
default via 10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
10.0.2.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15
10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
192.168.52.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.52.101
virtualbox 17.04 netplan
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm running VirtualBox with 2 network adapters: standard NAT (enp0s3) and a Host-only Adapter (enp0s8). I use the NAT to access the internet and the Host-only Adapter to SSH in from my local machine.
The box boots up with both adapters enabled, both have IP addresses, everything looking good.
I can SSH into this box over the host-only adapter, no issues there. But I can't get on the internet with it. However, if I disable the host-only adapter, then I can access the internet (but obviously I can no longer SSH into it over the local tunnel).
And finally, here is my netplan yaml config:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s3:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
enp0s8:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.52.101/24]
gateway4: 192.168.52.101
Any ideas? It seems like maybe all my outbound traffic is routing through the host-only adapter somehow.
Edit: attaching the output of ip route list
in case it helps.
default via 192.168.52.101 dev enp0s8 proto static
default via 10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
10.0.2.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15
10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
192.168.52.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.52.101
virtualbox 17.04 netplan
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I'm running VirtualBox with 2 network adapters: standard NAT (enp0s3) and a Host-only Adapter (enp0s8). I use the NAT to access the internet and the Host-only Adapter to SSH in from my local machine.
The box boots up with both adapters enabled, both have IP addresses, everything looking good.
I can SSH into this box over the host-only adapter, no issues there. But I can't get on the internet with it. However, if I disable the host-only adapter, then I can access the internet (but obviously I can no longer SSH into it over the local tunnel).
And finally, here is my netplan yaml config:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s3:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
enp0s8:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.52.101/24]
gateway4: 192.168.52.101
Any ideas? It seems like maybe all my outbound traffic is routing through the host-only adapter somehow.
Edit: attaching the output of ip route list
in case it helps.
default via 192.168.52.101 dev enp0s8 proto static
default via 10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
10.0.2.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15
10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
192.168.52.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.52.101
virtualbox 17.04 netplan
I'm running VirtualBox with 2 network adapters: standard NAT (enp0s3) and a Host-only Adapter (enp0s8). I use the NAT to access the internet and the Host-only Adapter to SSH in from my local machine.
The box boots up with both adapters enabled, both have IP addresses, everything looking good.
I can SSH into this box over the host-only adapter, no issues there. But I can't get on the internet with it. However, if I disable the host-only adapter, then I can access the internet (but obviously I can no longer SSH into it over the local tunnel).
And finally, here is my netplan yaml config:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# For more information, see netplan(5).
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s3:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
enp0s8:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.52.101/24]
gateway4: 192.168.52.101
Any ideas? It seems like maybe all my outbound traffic is routing through the host-only adapter somehow.
Edit: attaching the output of ip route list
in case it helps.
default via 192.168.52.101 dev enp0s8 proto static
default via 10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
10.0.2.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15
10.0.2.2 dev enp0s3 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 100
192.168.52.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.52.101
virtualbox 17.04 netplan
edited Apr 11 at 3:27
dpb
4,88911545
4,88911545
asked Dec 8 '17 at 17:31
hellojason
263
263
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17
add a comment |Â
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I found this problem doing exactly the same thing this afternoon. Somehow managed to figure it out and netplan finally created only 1 default route through the NAT interface of my VM. In my case, both IP's were 192.168.56.101 (host-only) and 10.0.3.x/24 (NAT dhcp4). I'm using this netplan file:
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s8:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 10.0.3.2
metric: 0
enp0s3:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.56.101/24]
routes:
- to: 192.168.56.1/24
via: 192.168.56.1
metric: 100
With this I have only one default route, and it's using the NAT so it can reach the internet through my host.
Output of ip r
default via 10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
10.0.3.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.3.15
10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
192.168.56.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.56.10
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For me removing gateway4
from configuration did the trick. With it configured I was also not able to ping internet.
Here is my netPlan config if it can help others.
Note: enp0s3 is for ssh via port forwarding and enp0s8 for static ip
network:
ethernets:
enp0s3:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
optional: true
enp0s8:
addresses: [192.168.10.20/24]
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4]
version: 2
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As a note, while I was struggling with this and VMware Fusion... If you have any 'gateway4' value specified, it will assume that as default for the interface, and it doesn't seem to respect the 'metric' option or having multiple .yaml files with a numbering sequence (01-netplan.yaml, 02-netplan.yaml, etc...) in my case 02 ended up being the 'first default', but that is my internal network so public internet was unreachable.
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I found this problem doing exactly the same thing this afternoon. Somehow managed to figure it out and netplan finally created only 1 default route through the NAT interface of my VM. In my case, both IP's were 192.168.56.101 (host-only) and 10.0.3.x/24 (NAT dhcp4). I'm using this netplan file:
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s8:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 10.0.3.2
metric: 0
enp0s3:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.56.101/24]
routes:
- to: 192.168.56.1/24
via: 192.168.56.1
metric: 100
With this I have only one default route, and it's using the NAT so it can reach the internet through my host.
Output of ip r
default via 10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
10.0.3.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.3.15
10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
192.168.56.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.56.10
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
I found this problem doing exactly the same thing this afternoon. Somehow managed to figure it out and netplan finally created only 1 default route through the NAT interface of my VM. In my case, both IP's were 192.168.56.101 (host-only) and 10.0.3.x/24 (NAT dhcp4). I'm using this netplan file:
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s8:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 10.0.3.2
metric: 0
enp0s3:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.56.101/24]
routes:
- to: 192.168.56.1/24
via: 192.168.56.1
metric: 100
With this I have only one default route, and it's using the NAT so it can reach the internet through my host.
Output of ip r
default via 10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
10.0.3.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.3.15
10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
192.168.56.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.56.10
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
I found this problem doing exactly the same thing this afternoon. Somehow managed to figure it out and netplan finally created only 1 default route through the NAT interface of my VM. In my case, both IP's were 192.168.56.101 (host-only) and 10.0.3.x/24 (NAT dhcp4). I'm using this netplan file:
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s8:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 10.0.3.2
metric: 0
enp0s3:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.56.101/24]
routes:
- to: 192.168.56.1/24
via: 192.168.56.1
metric: 100
With this I have only one default route, and it's using the NAT so it can reach the internet through my host.
Output of ip r
default via 10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
10.0.3.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.3.15
10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
192.168.56.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.56.10
I found this problem doing exactly the same thing this afternoon. Somehow managed to figure it out and netplan finally created only 1 default route through the NAT interface of my VM. In my case, both IP's were 192.168.56.101 (host-only) and 10.0.3.x/24 (NAT dhcp4). I'm using this netplan file:
network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
enp0s8:
dhcp4: yes
dhcp6: yes
routes:
- to: 0.0.0.0/0
via: 10.0.3.2
metric: 0
enp0s3:
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
addresses: [192.168.56.101/24]
routes:
- to: 192.168.56.1/24
via: 192.168.56.1
metric: 100
With this I have only one default route, and it's using the NAT so it can reach the internet through my host.
Output of ip r
default via 10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
10.0.3.0/24 dev enp0s8 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.3.15
10.0.3.2 dev enp0s8 proto dhcp scope link src 10.0.3.15 metric 100
192.168.56.0/24 dev enp0s3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.56.10
answered Jan 12 at 0:45
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/V1NCl.jpg?s=32&g=1)
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/V1NCl.jpg?s=32&g=1)
alfonso.ss
14114
14114
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
2
2
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
Great answer! You indeed need to set up your own routing in this case. If both devices include a "default gateway" (ie. they specify "dhcp4" or "dhcp6", or set "gateway4"), then the system will set up both devices with a default gateway with the same metric. You won't need the route on enp0s3 however, since the "addresses" already contain the same /24 subnet as the one that would be used to access 192.168.56.1. Alternatively, set your own routing everywhere as you are doing.
â Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Mar 9 at 11:23
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For me removing gateway4
from configuration did the trick. With it configured I was also not able to ping internet.
Here is my netPlan config if it can help others.
Note: enp0s3 is for ssh via port forwarding and enp0s8 for static ip
network:
ethernets:
enp0s3:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
optional: true
enp0s8:
addresses: [192.168.10.20/24]
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4]
version: 2
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For me removing gateway4
from configuration did the trick. With it configured I was also not able to ping internet.
Here is my netPlan config if it can help others.
Note: enp0s3 is for ssh via port forwarding and enp0s8 for static ip
network:
ethernets:
enp0s3:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
optional: true
enp0s8:
addresses: [192.168.10.20/24]
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4]
version: 2
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
For me removing gateway4
from configuration did the trick. With it configured I was also not able to ping internet.
Here is my netPlan config if it can help others.
Note: enp0s3 is for ssh via port forwarding and enp0s8 for static ip
network:
ethernets:
enp0s3:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
optional: true
enp0s8:
addresses: [192.168.10.20/24]
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4]
version: 2
For me removing gateway4
from configuration did the trick. With it configured I was also not able to ping internet.
Here is my netPlan config if it can help others.
Note: enp0s3 is for ssh via port forwarding and enp0s8 for static ip
network:
ethernets:
enp0s3:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
optional: true
enp0s8:
addresses: [192.168.10.20/24]
dhcp4: no
dhcp6: no
nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4]
version: 2
answered Jul 2 at 15:30
Ahsan.Amin
1211
1211
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As a note, while I was struggling with this and VMware Fusion... If you have any 'gateway4' value specified, it will assume that as default for the interface, and it doesn't seem to respect the 'metric' option or having multiple .yaml files with a numbering sequence (01-netplan.yaml, 02-netplan.yaml, etc...) in my case 02 ended up being the 'first default', but that is my internal network so public internet was unreachable.
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As a note, while I was struggling with this and VMware Fusion... If you have any 'gateway4' value specified, it will assume that as default for the interface, and it doesn't seem to respect the 'metric' option or having multiple .yaml files with a numbering sequence (01-netplan.yaml, 02-netplan.yaml, etc...) in my case 02 ended up being the 'first default', but that is my internal network so public internet was unreachable.
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As a note, while I was struggling with this and VMware Fusion... If you have any 'gateway4' value specified, it will assume that as default for the interface, and it doesn't seem to respect the 'metric' option or having multiple .yaml files with a numbering sequence (01-netplan.yaml, 02-netplan.yaml, etc...) in my case 02 ended up being the 'first default', but that is my internal network so public internet was unreachable.
As a note, while I was struggling with this and VMware Fusion... If you have any 'gateway4' value specified, it will assume that as default for the interface, and it doesn't seem to respect the 'metric' option or having multiple .yaml files with a numbering sequence (01-netplan.yaml, 02-netplan.yaml, etc...) in my case 02 ended up being the 'first default', but that is my internal network so public internet was unreachable.
answered Feb 23 at 1:47
Mike Roy
1
1
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
add a comment |Â
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
Hi Mike -- welcome to askubuntu. This would be better as a Comment under the question. You should move the text there and just delete this as it isn't intended to "answer" the question.
â dpb
Apr 11 at 3:35
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f984445%2fnetplan-configuration-on-ubuntu-17-04-virtual-machine%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Forget it, I couldn't figure out netplan so I formatted and installed Ubuntu 16 instead.
â hellojason
Dec 11 '17 at 2:17