How can I diagnose/debug “maximum number of clients reached” X errors?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP








up vote
31
down vote

favorite
7












I'm hitting a problem whereby X prevents processes from creating windows, uttering something like the following into ~/.xsession-errors:



cannot open display: :0.0
Maximum number of clients reached


Searching around there are lots of examples of people facing this problem, and sometimes people identify which program they are running is using up all the client slots. See e.g.
LP 70872 (Firefox),
LP 263211 (gnome-screensaver).



For what it's worth, I run gnome-terminal, thunderbird, chromium-browser, empathy, tomboy and virtualbox nearly all the time, on top of the normal stuff you get with the GNOME desktop, and occasionally some other bits and pieces.



However my question is not "which of my programs is causing this problem" but rather, how can one go about diagnosing this problem?



In the above (and other) bugs, forum reports, etc., a number of tools are suggested:




  • xlsclients - lists the client applications for the given display, but I don't think that corresponds to 'X clients'


  • xrestop - a top-style X resources tool, one row per X client. Lots of '' clients, not shown in xlsclients output


  • xwininfo -root -children lists X window objects

From what I can gather, the problem might not be too many clients at all, but rather resources kept around in the X server for clients who have long-since detached. But it would also appear that you cannot (easily?) relate X resources back to their client. Can one effectively diagnose this issue once it has started to occur, or is a tedious divide-and-conquer approach for the apps I run the only approach open to me?



Update Jan 2011: I think I have resolved this issue. For the benefit of anyone stumbling across this, nautilus and/or compiz or something in that chain of software was segfaulting due to a wallpaper I had. I had chosen an XML file as my wallpaper, which defined a rotating gallery of images. It was hand-made, but based on /usr/share/backgrounds/contest/background-1.xml or similar. Disabling the wallpaper and I have not had a crash since.



I'm not marking this as answered yet, since the actual specific problem was not my question, but how to diagnose it was. Unfortunately this was mostly trial-and-error which sucks.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
    – jneves
    Oct 10 '10 at 9:25










  • xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
    – Sanjay Manohar
    Mar 11 '15 at 18:25











  • Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
    – gumkins
    Jun 18 '17 at 13:45














up vote
31
down vote

favorite
7












I'm hitting a problem whereby X prevents processes from creating windows, uttering something like the following into ~/.xsession-errors:



cannot open display: :0.0
Maximum number of clients reached


Searching around there are lots of examples of people facing this problem, and sometimes people identify which program they are running is using up all the client slots. See e.g.
LP 70872 (Firefox),
LP 263211 (gnome-screensaver).



For what it's worth, I run gnome-terminal, thunderbird, chromium-browser, empathy, tomboy and virtualbox nearly all the time, on top of the normal stuff you get with the GNOME desktop, and occasionally some other bits and pieces.



However my question is not "which of my programs is causing this problem" but rather, how can one go about diagnosing this problem?



In the above (and other) bugs, forum reports, etc., a number of tools are suggested:




  • xlsclients - lists the client applications for the given display, but I don't think that corresponds to 'X clients'


  • xrestop - a top-style X resources tool, one row per X client. Lots of '' clients, not shown in xlsclients output


  • xwininfo -root -children lists X window objects

From what I can gather, the problem might not be too many clients at all, but rather resources kept around in the X server for clients who have long-since detached. But it would also appear that you cannot (easily?) relate X resources back to their client. Can one effectively diagnose this issue once it has started to occur, or is a tedious divide-and-conquer approach for the apps I run the only approach open to me?



Update Jan 2011: I think I have resolved this issue. For the benefit of anyone stumbling across this, nautilus and/or compiz or something in that chain of software was segfaulting due to a wallpaper I had. I had chosen an XML file as my wallpaper, which defined a rotating gallery of images. It was hand-made, but based on /usr/share/backgrounds/contest/background-1.xml or similar. Disabling the wallpaper and I have not had a crash since.



I'm not marking this as answered yet, since the actual specific problem was not my question, but how to diagnose it was. Unfortunately this was mostly trial-and-error which sucks.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
    – jneves
    Oct 10 '10 at 9:25










  • xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
    – Sanjay Manohar
    Mar 11 '15 at 18:25











  • Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
    – gumkins
    Jun 18 '17 at 13:45












up vote
31
down vote

favorite
7









up vote
31
down vote

favorite
7






7





I'm hitting a problem whereby X prevents processes from creating windows, uttering something like the following into ~/.xsession-errors:



cannot open display: :0.0
Maximum number of clients reached


Searching around there are lots of examples of people facing this problem, and sometimes people identify which program they are running is using up all the client slots. See e.g.
LP 70872 (Firefox),
LP 263211 (gnome-screensaver).



For what it's worth, I run gnome-terminal, thunderbird, chromium-browser, empathy, tomboy and virtualbox nearly all the time, on top of the normal stuff you get with the GNOME desktop, and occasionally some other bits and pieces.



However my question is not "which of my programs is causing this problem" but rather, how can one go about diagnosing this problem?



In the above (and other) bugs, forum reports, etc., a number of tools are suggested:




  • xlsclients - lists the client applications for the given display, but I don't think that corresponds to 'X clients'


  • xrestop - a top-style X resources tool, one row per X client. Lots of '' clients, not shown in xlsclients output


  • xwininfo -root -children lists X window objects

From what I can gather, the problem might not be too many clients at all, but rather resources kept around in the X server for clients who have long-since detached. But it would also appear that you cannot (easily?) relate X resources back to their client. Can one effectively diagnose this issue once it has started to occur, or is a tedious divide-and-conquer approach for the apps I run the only approach open to me?



Update Jan 2011: I think I have resolved this issue. For the benefit of anyone stumbling across this, nautilus and/or compiz or something in that chain of software was segfaulting due to a wallpaper I had. I had chosen an XML file as my wallpaper, which defined a rotating gallery of images. It was hand-made, but based on /usr/share/backgrounds/contest/background-1.xml or similar. Disabling the wallpaper and I have not had a crash since.



I'm not marking this as answered yet, since the actual specific problem was not my question, but how to diagnose it was. Unfortunately this was mostly trial-and-error which sucks.










share|improve this question















I'm hitting a problem whereby X prevents processes from creating windows, uttering something like the following into ~/.xsession-errors:



cannot open display: :0.0
Maximum number of clients reached


Searching around there are lots of examples of people facing this problem, and sometimes people identify which program they are running is using up all the client slots. See e.g.
LP 70872 (Firefox),
LP 263211 (gnome-screensaver).



For what it's worth, I run gnome-terminal, thunderbird, chromium-browser, empathy, tomboy and virtualbox nearly all the time, on top of the normal stuff you get with the GNOME desktop, and occasionally some other bits and pieces.



However my question is not "which of my programs is causing this problem" but rather, how can one go about diagnosing this problem?



In the above (and other) bugs, forum reports, etc., a number of tools are suggested:




  • xlsclients - lists the client applications for the given display, but I don't think that corresponds to 'X clients'


  • xrestop - a top-style X resources tool, one row per X client. Lots of '' clients, not shown in xlsclients output


  • xwininfo -root -children lists X window objects

From what I can gather, the problem might not be too many clients at all, but rather resources kept around in the X server for clients who have long-since detached. But it would also appear that you cannot (easily?) relate X resources back to their client. Can one effectively diagnose this issue once it has started to occur, or is a tedious divide-and-conquer approach for the apps I run the only approach open to me?



Update Jan 2011: I think I have resolved this issue. For the benefit of anyone stumbling across this, nautilus and/or compiz or something in that chain of software was segfaulting due to a wallpaper I had. I had chosen an XML file as my wallpaper, which defined a rotating gallery of images. It was hand-made, but based on /usr/share/backgrounds/contest/background-1.xml or similar. Disabling the wallpaper and I have not had a crash since.



I'm not marking this as answered yet, since the actual specific problem was not my question, but how to diagnose it was. Unfortunately this was mostly trial-and-error which sucks.







xorg debug






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 18 '12 at 18:19









Bruno Pereira

58.4k26176203




58.4k26176203










asked Sep 21 '10 at 13:02









jmtd

5461511




5461511







  • 1




    Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
    – jneves
    Oct 10 '10 at 9:25










  • xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
    – Sanjay Manohar
    Mar 11 '15 at 18:25











  • Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
    – gumkins
    Jun 18 '17 at 13:45












  • 1




    Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
    – jneves
    Oct 10 '10 at 9:25










  • xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
    – Sanjay Manohar
    Mar 11 '15 at 18:25











  • Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
    – gumkins
    Jun 18 '17 at 13:45







1




1




Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
– jneves
Oct 10 '10 at 9:25




Have you checked the xrestop output? What do the first 3 lines tell you? How much memory/video memory do you have in the machine?
– jneves
Oct 10 '10 at 9:25












xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
– Sanjay Manohar
Mar 11 '15 at 18:25





xrestop won't start -- it also complains "Maximum number of clients reached"! --> unable to open display.
– Sanjay Manohar
Mar 11 '15 at 18:25













Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
– gumkins
Jun 18 '17 at 13:45




Probably this answer can be helpful for somebody
– gumkins
Jun 18 '17 at 13:45










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote













I managed to resolve this "deadlock", where none of the x-tools worked since they too need to connect to the X server, by using lsof -U which lists the processes that are using socket files.



In this example it was a bad startup script that spawned new "badproc" processes out of bounds.



Example output from lsof -U:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
badproc 4770 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3ba9540 13011 socket
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3bd21c0 13024 socket
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 4u unix 0xf39ef000 13080 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 13u unix 0xf3bf81c0 13563 socket
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 14u unix 0xf3bf8a80 13565 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3bf8e00 13568 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3b411c0 13580 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 17u unix 0xf0074380 13688 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 18u unix 0xf3b6e380 13621 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 21u unix 0xf0074c40 13778 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
badproc 4775 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2540 13013 socket
badproc 4781 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2c40 13021 socket
xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5540 13456 socket
xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 5u unix 0xf3ba98c0 13484 socket
xfwm4 4827 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5a80 13573 socket
xfwm4 4827 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b41000 13579 socket
Thunar 4831 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6b000 13598 socket
Thunar 4831 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
Thunar 4831 bohrax 9u unix 0xf3b41e00 13617 socket
Thunar 4831 bohrax 10u unix 0xf3b6e1c0 13620 socket
Thunar 4831 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022000 13643 socket
gam_serve 4834 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b6b540 13607 socket
gam_serve 4834 bohrax 7u unix 0xf3b41c40 13614 socket
gam_serve 4834 bohrax 8u unix 0xf0020000 13656 socket
xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ee00 13652 socket
xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3be5000 13655 socket
xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 9u unix 0xf0020540 13665 socket
xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0020380 13667 socket
xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0074000 13687 socket
python 4837 bohrax 4u unix 0xf00208c0 13672 socket
python 4837 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6bc40 13880 socket
dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ec40 13627 socket
dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 6u unix 0xf0022c40 13644 socket
dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 3u unix 0xf00221c0 13640 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 9u unix 0xf00228c0 13641 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0022a80 13642 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022380 13646 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 14u unix 0xf00201c0 13666 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3b41540 13796 socket
dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3bd28c0 13881 socket
badproc 6314 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d380 95944 socket
badproc 6315 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00d540 95946 socket
badproc 6322 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d8c0 96515 socket
badproc 6323 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00de00 96517 socket
badproc 6330 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea000 97181 socket
badproc 6331 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf7ea540 97184 socket
badproc 6338 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea8c0 97736 socket
badproc 6339 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0481c0 97737 socket
badproc 6345 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048700 98209 socket
badproc 6346 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0488c0 98210 socket
badproc 6352 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048e00 98776 socket
badproc 6353 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058000 98778 socket
badproc 6359 bohrax 3u unix 0xde058700 99293 socket
badproc 6360 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0588c0 99296 socket
badproc 6367 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c000 99841 socket
badproc 6368 bohrax 1u unix 0xde08c540 99842 socket
badproc 6375 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c8c0 100365 socket
badproc 6376 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058c40 100367 socket
badproc 6383 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09d1c0 101008 socket
badproc 6384 bohrax 1u unix 0xde09d540 101010 socket
badproc 6392 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09dc40 101681 socket
badproc 6393 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a1c0 101682 socket
badproc 6400 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70a380 102324 socket
badproc 6401 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a700 102325 socket
badproc 6409 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70ae00 102982 socket
badproc 6410 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce1c0 102984 socket
badproc 6417 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0ce380 103556 socket
badproc 6418 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce8c0 103561 socket
badproc 6424 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0cee00 104133 socket
badproc 6425 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd000 104135 socket
badproc 6432 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0bd380 104716 socket
badproc 6433 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd8c0 104717 socket
badproc 6440 bohrax 3u unix 0xde120000 105280 socket
badproc 6441 bohrax 1u unix 0xde120540 105285 socket
badproc 6448 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1208c0 105907 socket
badproc 6449 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bdc40 105908 socket
badproc 6456 bohrax 3u unix 0xf01701c0 106486 socket
badproc 6457 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170540 106488 socket
badproc 6465 bohrax 3u unix 0xf0170c40 107123 socket
badproc 6466 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170e00 107126 socket
badproc 6473 bohrax 3u unix 0xde140000 107774 socket
badproc 6474 bohrax 1u unix 0xde140540 107778 socket
badproc 6479 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1408c0 108239 socket
badproc 6480 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1881c0 108240 socket
badproc 6488 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188700 108825 socket
badproc 6489 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1888c0 108828 socket
badproc 6495 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188e00 109377 socket
badproc 6496 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f000 109379 socket
badproc 6503 bohrax 3u unix 0xde18f380 109907 socket
badproc 6504 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f8c0 109909 socket
badproc 6511 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c8000 110488 socket
badproc 6512 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1c8540 110489 socket
badproc 6519 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c88c0 111070 socket
badproc 6520 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18fc40 111071 socket
badproc 6527 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa1c0 111629 socket
badproc 6528 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fa540 111631 socket
badproc 6531 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa8c0 111899 socket
badproc 6532 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fae00 111901 socket
badproc 6535 bohrax 3u unix 0xde219000 111998 socket
badproc 6536 bohrax 1u unix 0xde219540 112000 socket
badproc 6539 bohrax 3u unix 0xde2198c0 112114 socket
badproc 6540 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2431c0 112116 socket
badproc 6547 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243380 112663 socket
badproc 6548 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2438c0 112664 socket
badproc 6555 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243c40 113256 socket
badproc 6556 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251000 113258 socket
badproc 6564 bohrax 3u unix 0xde251700 113931 socket
badproc 6565 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2518c0 113932 socket
badproc 6572 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291000 114525 socket
badproc 6573 bohrax 1u unix 0xde291540 114526 socket
badproc 6579 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291c40 115112 socket
badproc 6580 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251c40 115113 socket
badproc 6588 bohrax 3u unix 0xde274380 115733 socket
badproc 6589 bohrax 1u unix 0xde274540 115738 socket





share|improve this answer




















  • In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
    – EFraim
    Jan 17 '16 at 23:22










  • In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
    – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
    Aug 1 at 3:43










  • lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
    – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
    Aug 1 at 3:43

















up vote
4
down vote













I have the same question, because I think this issue is significant for anyone who does not reboot their computer often. One thing I've really liked about UNIX/Linux/Ubuntu over the years is that I can reliably run my laptop for months without rebooting (suspending only), except when I install a new kernel. Since upgrading to the "suite" that is Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10), I've encountered this and can only run for a week.



I've tried 'xrestop', too; stopped the compiz window effects (that slowed down the resource leak), but still cannot find out why this is happening. It's almost like being back on a WinXP machine... :-(



So yes! Better X debugging tools would be good. One problem with 'xrestop' is that it requires resources, too, so once you hit the wall, even it won't run.



As a tip to others who get stuck by this (eg: when resuming from Standby and waiting for the password window that will never appear because there are no resources to create it), switching to a frame buffer terminal and back (Ctrl-Alt-F1, then Ctrl-Alt-F7) seems to free a few of the critical resources.



Doug






share|improve this answer




















  • Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
    – user10906
    Feb 15 '11 at 21:42











  • @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
    – Juan Simón
    Jan 7 '13 at 11:52










  • @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
    – vorburger
    Jan 11 '14 at 10:03

















up vote
2
down vote













Chromium/Chrome has some known issues which result in this error message. Do you use the Lastpass extension?



ref: http://www.ngohaibac.com/how-to-solve-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-gtk-warning-cannot-open-display-in-ubuntu-9-10-64-bit/






share|improve this answer




















  • I do not use that extension.
    – jmtd
    Oct 13 '10 at 22:51










  • Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
    – Jeremy
    Oct 14 '10 at 0:55










  • As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
    – jmtd
    Nov 4 '10 at 13:51










  • I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
    – dufte
    Nov 21 '16 at 7:05

















up vote
0
down vote













I make: lsof -U and I observe a lot of vlc instances.



For resolve my problem I execute:



killall vlc





share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    lsof -U show a huge number of xcape instances.



    kill xcape solve the problem.



    Now I can use rofi and tor-browser again.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "89"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f4499%2fhow-can-i-diagnose-debug-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-x-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      11
      down vote













      I managed to resolve this "deadlock", where none of the x-tools worked since they too need to connect to the X server, by using lsof -U which lists the processes that are using socket files.



      In this example it was a bad startup script that spawned new "badproc" processes out of bounds.



      Example output from lsof -U:



      COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
      badproc 4770 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3ba9540 13011 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3bd21c0 13024 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 4u unix 0xf39ef000 13080 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 13u unix 0xf3bf81c0 13563 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 14u unix 0xf3bf8a80 13565 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3bf8e00 13568 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3b411c0 13580 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 17u unix 0xf0074380 13688 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 18u unix 0xf3b6e380 13621 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 21u unix 0xf0074c40 13778 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      badproc 4775 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2540 13013 socket
      badproc 4781 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2c40 13021 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5540 13456 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 5u unix 0xf3ba98c0 13484 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5a80 13573 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b41000 13579 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6b000 13598 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 9u unix 0xf3b41e00 13617 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 10u unix 0xf3b6e1c0 13620 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022000 13643 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b6b540 13607 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 7u unix 0xf3b41c40 13614 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 8u unix 0xf0020000 13656 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ee00 13652 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3be5000 13655 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 9u unix 0xf0020540 13665 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0020380 13667 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0074000 13687 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 4u unix 0xf00208c0 13672 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6bc40 13880 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ec40 13627 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 6u unix 0xf0022c40 13644 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 3u unix 0xf00221c0 13640 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 9u unix 0xf00228c0 13641 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0022a80 13642 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022380 13646 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 14u unix 0xf00201c0 13666 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3b41540 13796 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3bd28c0 13881 socket
      badproc 6314 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d380 95944 socket
      badproc 6315 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00d540 95946 socket
      badproc 6322 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d8c0 96515 socket
      badproc 6323 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00de00 96517 socket
      badproc 6330 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea000 97181 socket
      badproc 6331 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf7ea540 97184 socket
      badproc 6338 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea8c0 97736 socket
      badproc 6339 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0481c0 97737 socket
      badproc 6345 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048700 98209 socket
      badproc 6346 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0488c0 98210 socket
      badproc 6352 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048e00 98776 socket
      badproc 6353 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058000 98778 socket
      badproc 6359 bohrax 3u unix 0xde058700 99293 socket
      badproc 6360 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0588c0 99296 socket
      badproc 6367 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c000 99841 socket
      badproc 6368 bohrax 1u unix 0xde08c540 99842 socket
      badproc 6375 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c8c0 100365 socket
      badproc 6376 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058c40 100367 socket
      badproc 6383 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09d1c0 101008 socket
      badproc 6384 bohrax 1u unix 0xde09d540 101010 socket
      badproc 6392 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09dc40 101681 socket
      badproc 6393 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a1c0 101682 socket
      badproc 6400 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70a380 102324 socket
      badproc 6401 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a700 102325 socket
      badproc 6409 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70ae00 102982 socket
      badproc 6410 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce1c0 102984 socket
      badproc 6417 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0ce380 103556 socket
      badproc 6418 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce8c0 103561 socket
      badproc 6424 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0cee00 104133 socket
      badproc 6425 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd000 104135 socket
      badproc 6432 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0bd380 104716 socket
      badproc 6433 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd8c0 104717 socket
      badproc 6440 bohrax 3u unix 0xde120000 105280 socket
      badproc 6441 bohrax 1u unix 0xde120540 105285 socket
      badproc 6448 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1208c0 105907 socket
      badproc 6449 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bdc40 105908 socket
      badproc 6456 bohrax 3u unix 0xf01701c0 106486 socket
      badproc 6457 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170540 106488 socket
      badproc 6465 bohrax 3u unix 0xf0170c40 107123 socket
      badproc 6466 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170e00 107126 socket
      badproc 6473 bohrax 3u unix 0xde140000 107774 socket
      badproc 6474 bohrax 1u unix 0xde140540 107778 socket
      badproc 6479 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1408c0 108239 socket
      badproc 6480 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1881c0 108240 socket
      badproc 6488 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188700 108825 socket
      badproc 6489 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1888c0 108828 socket
      badproc 6495 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188e00 109377 socket
      badproc 6496 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f000 109379 socket
      badproc 6503 bohrax 3u unix 0xde18f380 109907 socket
      badproc 6504 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f8c0 109909 socket
      badproc 6511 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c8000 110488 socket
      badproc 6512 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1c8540 110489 socket
      badproc 6519 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c88c0 111070 socket
      badproc 6520 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18fc40 111071 socket
      badproc 6527 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa1c0 111629 socket
      badproc 6528 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fa540 111631 socket
      badproc 6531 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa8c0 111899 socket
      badproc 6532 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fae00 111901 socket
      badproc 6535 bohrax 3u unix 0xde219000 111998 socket
      badproc 6536 bohrax 1u unix 0xde219540 112000 socket
      badproc 6539 bohrax 3u unix 0xde2198c0 112114 socket
      badproc 6540 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2431c0 112116 socket
      badproc 6547 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243380 112663 socket
      badproc 6548 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2438c0 112664 socket
      badproc 6555 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243c40 113256 socket
      badproc 6556 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251000 113258 socket
      badproc 6564 bohrax 3u unix 0xde251700 113931 socket
      badproc 6565 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2518c0 113932 socket
      badproc 6572 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291000 114525 socket
      badproc 6573 bohrax 1u unix 0xde291540 114526 socket
      badproc 6579 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291c40 115112 socket
      badproc 6580 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251c40 115113 socket
      badproc 6588 bohrax 3u unix 0xde274380 115733 socket
      badproc 6589 bohrax 1u unix 0xde274540 115738 socket





      share|improve this answer




















      • In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
        – EFraim
        Jan 17 '16 at 23:22










      • In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43










      • lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43














      up vote
      11
      down vote













      I managed to resolve this "deadlock", where none of the x-tools worked since they too need to connect to the X server, by using lsof -U which lists the processes that are using socket files.



      In this example it was a bad startup script that spawned new "badproc" processes out of bounds.



      Example output from lsof -U:



      COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
      badproc 4770 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3ba9540 13011 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3bd21c0 13024 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 4u unix 0xf39ef000 13080 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 13u unix 0xf3bf81c0 13563 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 14u unix 0xf3bf8a80 13565 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3bf8e00 13568 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3b411c0 13580 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 17u unix 0xf0074380 13688 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 18u unix 0xf3b6e380 13621 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 21u unix 0xf0074c40 13778 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      badproc 4775 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2540 13013 socket
      badproc 4781 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2c40 13021 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5540 13456 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 5u unix 0xf3ba98c0 13484 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5a80 13573 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b41000 13579 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6b000 13598 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 9u unix 0xf3b41e00 13617 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 10u unix 0xf3b6e1c0 13620 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022000 13643 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b6b540 13607 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 7u unix 0xf3b41c40 13614 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 8u unix 0xf0020000 13656 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ee00 13652 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3be5000 13655 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 9u unix 0xf0020540 13665 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0020380 13667 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0074000 13687 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 4u unix 0xf00208c0 13672 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6bc40 13880 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ec40 13627 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 6u unix 0xf0022c40 13644 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 3u unix 0xf00221c0 13640 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 9u unix 0xf00228c0 13641 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0022a80 13642 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022380 13646 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 14u unix 0xf00201c0 13666 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3b41540 13796 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3bd28c0 13881 socket
      badproc 6314 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d380 95944 socket
      badproc 6315 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00d540 95946 socket
      badproc 6322 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d8c0 96515 socket
      badproc 6323 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00de00 96517 socket
      badproc 6330 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea000 97181 socket
      badproc 6331 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf7ea540 97184 socket
      badproc 6338 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea8c0 97736 socket
      badproc 6339 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0481c0 97737 socket
      badproc 6345 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048700 98209 socket
      badproc 6346 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0488c0 98210 socket
      badproc 6352 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048e00 98776 socket
      badproc 6353 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058000 98778 socket
      badproc 6359 bohrax 3u unix 0xde058700 99293 socket
      badproc 6360 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0588c0 99296 socket
      badproc 6367 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c000 99841 socket
      badproc 6368 bohrax 1u unix 0xde08c540 99842 socket
      badproc 6375 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c8c0 100365 socket
      badproc 6376 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058c40 100367 socket
      badproc 6383 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09d1c0 101008 socket
      badproc 6384 bohrax 1u unix 0xde09d540 101010 socket
      badproc 6392 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09dc40 101681 socket
      badproc 6393 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a1c0 101682 socket
      badproc 6400 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70a380 102324 socket
      badproc 6401 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a700 102325 socket
      badproc 6409 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70ae00 102982 socket
      badproc 6410 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce1c0 102984 socket
      badproc 6417 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0ce380 103556 socket
      badproc 6418 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce8c0 103561 socket
      badproc 6424 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0cee00 104133 socket
      badproc 6425 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd000 104135 socket
      badproc 6432 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0bd380 104716 socket
      badproc 6433 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd8c0 104717 socket
      badproc 6440 bohrax 3u unix 0xde120000 105280 socket
      badproc 6441 bohrax 1u unix 0xde120540 105285 socket
      badproc 6448 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1208c0 105907 socket
      badproc 6449 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bdc40 105908 socket
      badproc 6456 bohrax 3u unix 0xf01701c0 106486 socket
      badproc 6457 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170540 106488 socket
      badproc 6465 bohrax 3u unix 0xf0170c40 107123 socket
      badproc 6466 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170e00 107126 socket
      badproc 6473 bohrax 3u unix 0xde140000 107774 socket
      badproc 6474 bohrax 1u unix 0xde140540 107778 socket
      badproc 6479 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1408c0 108239 socket
      badproc 6480 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1881c0 108240 socket
      badproc 6488 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188700 108825 socket
      badproc 6489 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1888c0 108828 socket
      badproc 6495 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188e00 109377 socket
      badproc 6496 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f000 109379 socket
      badproc 6503 bohrax 3u unix 0xde18f380 109907 socket
      badproc 6504 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f8c0 109909 socket
      badproc 6511 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c8000 110488 socket
      badproc 6512 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1c8540 110489 socket
      badproc 6519 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c88c0 111070 socket
      badproc 6520 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18fc40 111071 socket
      badproc 6527 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa1c0 111629 socket
      badproc 6528 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fa540 111631 socket
      badproc 6531 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa8c0 111899 socket
      badproc 6532 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fae00 111901 socket
      badproc 6535 bohrax 3u unix 0xde219000 111998 socket
      badproc 6536 bohrax 1u unix 0xde219540 112000 socket
      badproc 6539 bohrax 3u unix 0xde2198c0 112114 socket
      badproc 6540 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2431c0 112116 socket
      badproc 6547 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243380 112663 socket
      badproc 6548 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2438c0 112664 socket
      badproc 6555 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243c40 113256 socket
      badproc 6556 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251000 113258 socket
      badproc 6564 bohrax 3u unix 0xde251700 113931 socket
      badproc 6565 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2518c0 113932 socket
      badproc 6572 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291000 114525 socket
      badproc 6573 bohrax 1u unix 0xde291540 114526 socket
      badproc 6579 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291c40 115112 socket
      badproc 6580 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251c40 115113 socket
      badproc 6588 bohrax 3u unix 0xde274380 115733 socket
      badproc 6589 bohrax 1u unix 0xde274540 115738 socket





      share|improve this answer




















      • In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
        – EFraim
        Jan 17 '16 at 23:22










      • In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43










      • lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43












      up vote
      11
      down vote










      up vote
      11
      down vote









      I managed to resolve this "deadlock", where none of the x-tools worked since they too need to connect to the X server, by using lsof -U which lists the processes that are using socket files.



      In this example it was a bad startup script that spawned new "badproc" processes out of bounds.



      Example output from lsof -U:



      COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
      badproc 4770 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3ba9540 13011 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3bd21c0 13024 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 4u unix 0xf39ef000 13080 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 13u unix 0xf3bf81c0 13563 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 14u unix 0xf3bf8a80 13565 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3bf8e00 13568 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3b411c0 13580 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 17u unix 0xf0074380 13688 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 18u unix 0xf3b6e380 13621 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 21u unix 0xf0074c40 13778 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      badproc 4775 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2540 13013 socket
      badproc 4781 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2c40 13021 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5540 13456 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 5u unix 0xf3ba98c0 13484 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5a80 13573 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b41000 13579 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6b000 13598 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 9u unix 0xf3b41e00 13617 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 10u unix 0xf3b6e1c0 13620 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022000 13643 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b6b540 13607 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 7u unix 0xf3b41c40 13614 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 8u unix 0xf0020000 13656 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ee00 13652 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3be5000 13655 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 9u unix 0xf0020540 13665 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0020380 13667 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0074000 13687 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 4u unix 0xf00208c0 13672 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6bc40 13880 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ec40 13627 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 6u unix 0xf0022c40 13644 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 3u unix 0xf00221c0 13640 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 9u unix 0xf00228c0 13641 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0022a80 13642 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022380 13646 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 14u unix 0xf00201c0 13666 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3b41540 13796 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3bd28c0 13881 socket
      badproc 6314 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d380 95944 socket
      badproc 6315 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00d540 95946 socket
      badproc 6322 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d8c0 96515 socket
      badproc 6323 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00de00 96517 socket
      badproc 6330 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea000 97181 socket
      badproc 6331 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf7ea540 97184 socket
      badproc 6338 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea8c0 97736 socket
      badproc 6339 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0481c0 97737 socket
      badproc 6345 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048700 98209 socket
      badproc 6346 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0488c0 98210 socket
      badproc 6352 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048e00 98776 socket
      badproc 6353 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058000 98778 socket
      badproc 6359 bohrax 3u unix 0xde058700 99293 socket
      badproc 6360 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0588c0 99296 socket
      badproc 6367 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c000 99841 socket
      badproc 6368 bohrax 1u unix 0xde08c540 99842 socket
      badproc 6375 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c8c0 100365 socket
      badproc 6376 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058c40 100367 socket
      badproc 6383 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09d1c0 101008 socket
      badproc 6384 bohrax 1u unix 0xde09d540 101010 socket
      badproc 6392 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09dc40 101681 socket
      badproc 6393 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a1c0 101682 socket
      badproc 6400 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70a380 102324 socket
      badproc 6401 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a700 102325 socket
      badproc 6409 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70ae00 102982 socket
      badproc 6410 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce1c0 102984 socket
      badproc 6417 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0ce380 103556 socket
      badproc 6418 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce8c0 103561 socket
      badproc 6424 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0cee00 104133 socket
      badproc 6425 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd000 104135 socket
      badproc 6432 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0bd380 104716 socket
      badproc 6433 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd8c0 104717 socket
      badproc 6440 bohrax 3u unix 0xde120000 105280 socket
      badproc 6441 bohrax 1u unix 0xde120540 105285 socket
      badproc 6448 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1208c0 105907 socket
      badproc 6449 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bdc40 105908 socket
      badproc 6456 bohrax 3u unix 0xf01701c0 106486 socket
      badproc 6457 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170540 106488 socket
      badproc 6465 bohrax 3u unix 0xf0170c40 107123 socket
      badproc 6466 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170e00 107126 socket
      badproc 6473 bohrax 3u unix 0xde140000 107774 socket
      badproc 6474 bohrax 1u unix 0xde140540 107778 socket
      badproc 6479 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1408c0 108239 socket
      badproc 6480 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1881c0 108240 socket
      badproc 6488 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188700 108825 socket
      badproc 6489 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1888c0 108828 socket
      badproc 6495 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188e00 109377 socket
      badproc 6496 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f000 109379 socket
      badproc 6503 bohrax 3u unix 0xde18f380 109907 socket
      badproc 6504 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f8c0 109909 socket
      badproc 6511 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c8000 110488 socket
      badproc 6512 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1c8540 110489 socket
      badproc 6519 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c88c0 111070 socket
      badproc 6520 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18fc40 111071 socket
      badproc 6527 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa1c0 111629 socket
      badproc 6528 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fa540 111631 socket
      badproc 6531 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa8c0 111899 socket
      badproc 6532 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fae00 111901 socket
      badproc 6535 bohrax 3u unix 0xde219000 111998 socket
      badproc 6536 bohrax 1u unix 0xde219540 112000 socket
      badproc 6539 bohrax 3u unix 0xde2198c0 112114 socket
      badproc 6540 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2431c0 112116 socket
      badproc 6547 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243380 112663 socket
      badproc 6548 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2438c0 112664 socket
      badproc 6555 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243c40 113256 socket
      badproc 6556 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251000 113258 socket
      badproc 6564 bohrax 3u unix 0xde251700 113931 socket
      badproc 6565 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2518c0 113932 socket
      badproc 6572 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291000 114525 socket
      badproc 6573 bohrax 1u unix 0xde291540 114526 socket
      badproc 6579 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291c40 115112 socket
      badproc 6580 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251c40 115113 socket
      badproc 6588 bohrax 3u unix 0xde274380 115733 socket
      badproc 6589 bohrax 1u unix 0xde274540 115738 socket





      share|improve this answer












      I managed to resolve this "deadlock", where none of the x-tools worked since they too need to connect to the X server, by using lsof -U which lists the processes that are using socket files.



      In this example it was a bad startup script that spawned new "badproc" processes out of bounds.



      Example output from lsof -U:



      COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
      badproc 4770 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3ba9540 13011 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3bd21c0 13024 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 4u unix 0xf39ef000 13080 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 13u unix 0xf3bf81c0 13563 socket
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 14u unix 0xf3bf8a80 13565 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3bf8e00 13568 /tmp/orbit-bohrax /linc-12a5-0-78fe5c0776a06
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3b411c0 13580 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 17u unix 0xf0074380 13688 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 18u unix 0xf3b6e380 13621 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      xfce4-ses 4773 bohrax 21u unix 0xf0074c40 13778 /tmp/.ICE-unix/4773
      badproc 4775 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2540 13013 socket
      badproc 4781 bohrax 1u unix 0xf3bd2c40 13021 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5540 13456 socket
      xfce-mcs- 4821 bohrax 5u unix 0xf3ba98c0 13484 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3be5a80 13573 socket
      xfwm4 4827 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b41000 13579 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6b000 13598 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 9u unix 0xf3b41e00 13617 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 10u unix 0xf3b6e1c0 13620 socket
      Thunar 4831 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022000 13643 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 4u unix 0xf3b6b540 13607 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 7u unix 0xf3b41c40 13614 socket
      gam_serve 4834 bohrax 8u unix 0xf0020000 13656 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ee00 13652 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3be5000 13655 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 9u unix 0xf0020540 13665 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0020380 13667 socket
      xfdesktop 4836 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0074000 13687 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 4u unix 0xf00208c0 13672 socket
      python 4837 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6bc40 13880 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 3u unix 0xf3b6ec40 13627 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 6u unix 0xf0022c40 13644 socket
      dbus-laun 4841 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 3u unix 0xf00221c0 13640 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 8u unix 0xf3b6be00 13613 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 9u unix 0xf00228c0 13641 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 10u unix 0xf0022a80 13642 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 13u unix 0xf0022380 13646 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 14u unix 0xf00201c0 13666 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 15u unix 0xf3b41540 13796 socket
      dbus-daem 4842 bohrax 16u unix 0xf3bd28c0 13881 socket
      badproc 6314 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d380 95944 socket
      badproc 6315 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00d540 95946 socket
      badproc 6322 bohrax 3u unix 0xde00d8c0 96515 socket
      badproc 6323 bohrax 1u unix 0xde00de00 96517 socket
      badproc 6330 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea000 97181 socket
      badproc 6331 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf7ea540 97184 socket
      badproc 6338 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf7ea8c0 97736 socket
      badproc 6339 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0481c0 97737 socket
      badproc 6345 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048700 98209 socket
      badproc 6346 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0488c0 98210 socket
      badproc 6352 bohrax 3u unix 0xde048e00 98776 socket
      badproc 6353 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058000 98778 socket
      badproc 6359 bohrax 3u unix 0xde058700 99293 socket
      badproc 6360 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0588c0 99296 socket
      badproc 6367 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c000 99841 socket
      badproc 6368 bohrax 1u unix 0xde08c540 99842 socket
      badproc 6375 bohrax 3u unix 0xde08c8c0 100365 socket
      badproc 6376 bohrax 1u unix 0xde058c40 100367 socket
      badproc 6383 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09d1c0 101008 socket
      badproc 6384 bohrax 1u unix 0xde09d540 101010 socket
      badproc 6392 bohrax 3u unix 0xde09dc40 101681 socket
      badproc 6393 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a1c0 101682 socket
      badproc 6400 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70a380 102324 socket
      badproc 6401 bohrax 1u unix 0xdf70a700 102325 socket
      badproc 6409 bohrax 3u unix 0xdf70ae00 102982 socket
      badproc 6410 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce1c0 102984 socket
      badproc 6417 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0ce380 103556 socket
      badproc 6418 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0ce8c0 103561 socket
      badproc 6424 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0cee00 104133 socket
      badproc 6425 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd000 104135 socket
      badproc 6432 bohrax 3u unix 0xde0bd380 104716 socket
      badproc 6433 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bd8c0 104717 socket
      badproc 6440 bohrax 3u unix 0xde120000 105280 socket
      badproc 6441 bohrax 1u unix 0xde120540 105285 socket
      badproc 6448 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1208c0 105907 socket
      badproc 6449 bohrax 1u unix 0xde0bdc40 105908 socket
      badproc 6456 bohrax 3u unix 0xf01701c0 106486 socket
      badproc 6457 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170540 106488 socket
      badproc 6465 bohrax 3u unix 0xf0170c40 107123 socket
      badproc 6466 bohrax 1u unix 0xf0170e00 107126 socket
      badproc 6473 bohrax 3u unix 0xde140000 107774 socket
      badproc 6474 bohrax 1u unix 0xde140540 107778 socket
      badproc 6479 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1408c0 108239 socket
      badproc 6480 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1881c0 108240 socket
      badproc 6488 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188700 108825 socket
      badproc 6489 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1888c0 108828 socket
      badproc 6495 bohrax 3u unix 0xde188e00 109377 socket
      badproc 6496 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f000 109379 socket
      badproc 6503 bohrax 3u unix 0xde18f380 109907 socket
      badproc 6504 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18f8c0 109909 socket
      badproc 6511 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c8000 110488 socket
      badproc 6512 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1c8540 110489 socket
      badproc 6519 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1c88c0 111070 socket
      badproc 6520 bohrax 1u unix 0xde18fc40 111071 socket
      badproc 6527 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa1c0 111629 socket
      badproc 6528 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fa540 111631 socket
      badproc 6531 bohrax 3u unix 0xde1fa8c0 111899 socket
      badproc 6532 bohrax 1u unix 0xde1fae00 111901 socket
      badproc 6535 bohrax 3u unix 0xde219000 111998 socket
      badproc 6536 bohrax 1u unix 0xde219540 112000 socket
      badproc 6539 bohrax 3u unix 0xde2198c0 112114 socket
      badproc 6540 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2431c0 112116 socket
      badproc 6547 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243380 112663 socket
      badproc 6548 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2438c0 112664 socket
      badproc 6555 bohrax 3u unix 0xde243c40 113256 socket
      badproc 6556 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251000 113258 socket
      badproc 6564 bohrax 3u unix 0xde251700 113931 socket
      badproc 6565 bohrax 1u unix 0xde2518c0 113932 socket
      badproc 6572 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291000 114525 socket
      badproc 6573 bohrax 1u unix 0xde291540 114526 socket
      badproc 6579 bohrax 3u unix 0xde291c40 115112 socket
      badproc 6580 bohrax 1u unix 0xde251c40 115113 socket
      badproc 6588 bohrax 3u unix 0xde274380 115733 socket
      badproc 6589 bohrax 1u unix 0xde274540 115738 socket






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 16 '14 at 11:25









      bohrax

      31136




      31136











      • In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
        – EFraim
        Jan 17 '16 at 23:22










      • In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43










      • lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43
















      • In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
        – EFraim
        Jan 17 '16 at 23:22










      • In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43










      • lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
        – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
        Aug 1 at 3:43















      In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
      – EFraim
      Jan 17 '16 at 23:22




      In my case it was the baloo_file_extractor gone wild.
      – EFraim
      Jan 17 '16 at 23:22












      In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
      – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
      Aug 1 at 3:43




      In my case, it was an old version of TeamViewer. While trying to start, it opened too many processes and connections to the X server, then it failed to start, and everything came back to normal.
      – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
      Aug 1 at 3:43












      lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
      – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
      Aug 1 at 3:43




      lsof -U | wc -l may be useful.
      – Antonio Vinicius Menezes Medei
      Aug 1 at 3:43












      up vote
      4
      down vote













      I have the same question, because I think this issue is significant for anyone who does not reboot their computer often. One thing I've really liked about UNIX/Linux/Ubuntu over the years is that I can reliably run my laptop for months without rebooting (suspending only), except when I install a new kernel. Since upgrading to the "suite" that is Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10), I've encountered this and can only run for a week.



      I've tried 'xrestop', too; stopped the compiz window effects (that slowed down the resource leak), but still cannot find out why this is happening. It's almost like being back on a WinXP machine... :-(



      So yes! Better X debugging tools would be good. One problem with 'xrestop' is that it requires resources, too, so once you hit the wall, even it won't run.



      As a tip to others who get stuck by this (eg: when resuming from Standby and waiting for the password window that will never appear because there are no resources to create it), switching to a frame buffer terminal and back (Ctrl-Alt-F1, then Ctrl-Alt-F7) seems to free a few of the critical resources.



      Doug






      share|improve this answer




















      • Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
        – user10906
        Feb 15 '11 at 21:42











      • @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
        – Juan Simón
        Jan 7 '13 at 11:52










      • @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
        – vorburger
        Jan 11 '14 at 10:03














      up vote
      4
      down vote













      I have the same question, because I think this issue is significant for anyone who does not reboot their computer often. One thing I've really liked about UNIX/Linux/Ubuntu over the years is that I can reliably run my laptop for months without rebooting (suspending only), except when I install a new kernel. Since upgrading to the "suite" that is Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10), I've encountered this and can only run for a week.



      I've tried 'xrestop', too; stopped the compiz window effects (that slowed down the resource leak), but still cannot find out why this is happening. It's almost like being back on a WinXP machine... :-(



      So yes! Better X debugging tools would be good. One problem with 'xrestop' is that it requires resources, too, so once you hit the wall, even it won't run.



      As a tip to others who get stuck by this (eg: when resuming from Standby and waiting for the password window that will never appear because there are no resources to create it), switching to a frame buffer terminal and back (Ctrl-Alt-F1, then Ctrl-Alt-F7) seems to free a few of the critical resources.



      Doug






      share|improve this answer




















      • Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
        – user10906
        Feb 15 '11 at 21:42











      • @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
        – Juan Simón
        Jan 7 '13 at 11:52










      • @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
        – vorburger
        Jan 11 '14 at 10:03












      up vote
      4
      down vote










      up vote
      4
      down vote









      I have the same question, because I think this issue is significant for anyone who does not reboot their computer often. One thing I've really liked about UNIX/Linux/Ubuntu over the years is that I can reliably run my laptop for months without rebooting (suspending only), except when I install a new kernel. Since upgrading to the "suite" that is Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10), I've encountered this and can only run for a week.



      I've tried 'xrestop', too; stopped the compiz window effects (that slowed down the resource leak), but still cannot find out why this is happening. It's almost like being back on a WinXP machine... :-(



      So yes! Better X debugging tools would be good. One problem with 'xrestop' is that it requires resources, too, so once you hit the wall, even it won't run.



      As a tip to others who get stuck by this (eg: when resuming from Standby and waiting for the password window that will never appear because there are no resources to create it), switching to a frame buffer terminal and back (Ctrl-Alt-F1, then Ctrl-Alt-F7) seems to free a few of the critical resources.



      Doug






      share|improve this answer












      I have the same question, because I think this issue is significant for anyone who does not reboot their computer often. One thing I've really liked about UNIX/Linux/Ubuntu over the years is that I can reliably run my laptop for months without rebooting (suspending only), except when I install a new kernel. Since upgrading to the "suite" that is Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10), I've encountered this and can only run for a week.



      I've tried 'xrestop', too; stopped the compiz window effects (that slowed down the resource leak), but still cannot find out why this is happening. It's almost like being back on a WinXP machine... :-(



      So yes! Better X debugging tools would be good. One problem with 'xrestop' is that it requires resources, too, so once you hit the wall, even it won't run.



      As a tip to others who get stuck by this (eg: when resuming from Standby and waiting for the password window that will never appear because there are no resources to create it), switching to a frame buffer terminal and back (Ctrl-Alt-F1, then Ctrl-Alt-F7) seems to free a few of the critical resources.



      Doug







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Feb 15 '11 at 20:32







      user10906


















      • Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
        – user10906
        Feb 15 '11 at 21:42











      • @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
        – Juan Simón
        Jan 7 '13 at 11:52










      • @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
        – vorburger
        Jan 11 '14 at 10:03
















      • Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
        – user10906
        Feb 15 '11 at 21:42











      • @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
        – Juan Simón
        Jan 7 '13 at 11:52










      • @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
        – vorburger
        Jan 11 '14 at 10:03















      Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
      – user10906
      Feb 15 '11 at 21:42





      Just did some more searching and found a useful Python script to debug my problem (thanks Adam!). This allowed me to notice that an addon to my mail program, Thunderbird's Minimize-to-tray, was consuming extra file descriptors, 4 per minimize. Disabling it appears to have resolved the problem.
      – user10906
      Feb 15 '11 at 21:42













      @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
      – Juan Simón
      Jan 7 '13 at 11:52




      @user10906 That script is unusable: IndexError: list index out of range because some lines hasn't Path in netstat -an --unix output.
      – Juan Simón
      Jan 7 '13 at 11:52












      @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
      – vorburger
      Jan 11 '14 at 10:03




      @Simón I've fixed that script, see gist.github.com/vorburger/8369050. Although I'm not sure what to do with it, yet... ;-)
      – vorburger
      Jan 11 '14 at 10:03










      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Chromium/Chrome has some known issues which result in this error message. Do you use the Lastpass extension?



      ref: http://www.ngohaibac.com/how-to-solve-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-gtk-warning-cannot-open-display-in-ubuntu-9-10-64-bit/






      share|improve this answer




















      • I do not use that extension.
        – jmtd
        Oct 13 '10 at 22:51










      • Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
        – Jeremy
        Oct 14 '10 at 0:55










      • As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
        – jmtd
        Nov 4 '10 at 13:51










      • I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
        – dufte
        Nov 21 '16 at 7:05














      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Chromium/Chrome has some known issues which result in this error message. Do you use the Lastpass extension?



      ref: http://www.ngohaibac.com/how-to-solve-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-gtk-warning-cannot-open-display-in-ubuntu-9-10-64-bit/






      share|improve this answer




















      • I do not use that extension.
        – jmtd
        Oct 13 '10 at 22:51










      • Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
        – Jeremy
        Oct 14 '10 at 0:55










      • As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
        – jmtd
        Nov 4 '10 at 13:51










      • I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
        – dufte
        Nov 21 '16 at 7:05












      up vote
      2
      down vote










      up vote
      2
      down vote









      Chromium/Chrome has some known issues which result in this error message. Do you use the Lastpass extension?



      ref: http://www.ngohaibac.com/how-to-solve-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-gtk-warning-cannot-open-display-in-ubuntu-9-10-64-bit/






      share|improve this answer












      Chromium/Chrome has some known issues which result in this error message. Do you use the Lastpass extension?



      ref: http://www.ngohaibac.com/how-to-solve-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-gtk-warning-cannot-open-display-in-ubuntu-9-10-64-bit/







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Oct 13 '10 at 0:30









      Jeremy

      1,43731832




      1,43731832











      • I do not use that extension.
        – jmtd
        Oct 13 '10 at 22:51










      • Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
        – Jeremy
        Oct 14 '10 at 0:55










      • As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
        – jmtd
        Nov 4 '10 at 13:51










      • I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
        – dufte
        Nov 21 '16 at 7:05
















      • I do not use that extension.
        – jmtd
        Oct 13 '10 at 22:51










      • Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
        – Jeremy
        Oct 14 '10 at 0:55










      • As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
        – jmtd
        Nov 4 '10 at 13:51










      • I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
        – dufte
        Nov 21 '16 at 7:05















      I do not use that extension.
      – jmtd
      Oct 13 '10 at 22:51




      I do not use that extension.
      – jmtd
      Oct 13 '10 at 22:51












      Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
      – Jeremy
      Oct 14 '10 at 0:55




      Still worth testing the system with Chromium removed to see if it alleviates the problem. Not sure how you'd fix it once confirmed (short of removing Chromium, which I assume you'd want to avoid if possible).
      – Jeremy
      Oct 14 '10 at 0:55












      As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
      – jmtd
      Nov 4 '10 at 13:51




      As a last-ditch effort I could try that. The same applies to other software that google points the finger at, e.g., gnome-screensaver. The trouble is, I use chromium pretty heavily, so removing it, even temporarily, is quite a blow to my working practices. What I would really like to do is prove it was responsible without having to stop using it.
      – jmtd
      Nov 4 '10 at 13:51












      I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
      – dufte
      Nov 21 '16 at 7:05




      I had the same error (not using Lastpass) and a big amount of chrome processes was causing it for me (lsof helped finding the cause)
      – dufte
      Nov 21 '16 at 7:05










      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I make: lsof -U and I observe a lot of vlc instances.



      For resolve my problem I execute:



      killall vlc





      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        I make: lsof -U and I observe a lot of vlc instances.



        For resolve my problem I execute:



        killall vlc





        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          I make: lsof -U and I observe a lot of vlc instances.



          For resolve my problem I execute:



          killall vlc





          share|improve this answer












          I make: lsof -U and I observe a lot of vlc instances.



          For resolve my problem I execute:



          killall vlc






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 17 '17 at 19:50









          Virako

          1012




          1012




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              lsof -U show a huge number of xcape instances.



              kill xcape solve the problem.



              Now I can use rofi and tor-browser again.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                lsof -U show a huge number of xcape instances.



                kill xcape solve the problem.



                Now I can use rofi and tor-browser again.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  lsof -U show a huge number of xcape instances.



                  kill xcape solve the problem.



                  Now I can use rofi and tor-browser again.






                  share|improve this answer












                  lsof -U show a huge number of xcape instances.



                  kill xcape solve the problem.



                  Now I can use rofi and tor-browser again.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 23 at 5:45









                  azzamsa

                  314




                  314



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f4499%2fhow-can-i-diagnose-debug-maximum-number-of-clients-reached-x-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      pylint3 and pip3 broken

                      Missing snmpget and snmpwalk

                      How to enroll fingerprints to Ubuntu 17.10 with VFS491