Why is the apt sources different between a minimal and desktop install?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP


.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was banging my head not being able to install mariadb and python3-pip in a minimal install of Ubuntu 18.04. Every web search showed pages with the expected apt install package commands. When I installed a desktop version, I see sources.list under /etc/apt has far more lines with desktop than minimal.



Why would these be different for apt sources? I did plain vanilla choices on both.



Desktop Install:



-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2904 Aug 3 15:46 sources.list


Minimal Install:



-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 164 Aug 1 21:13 sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jul 25 23:04 sources.list.curtin.old


I can't post examples since I don't have enough reputation points due to links.







share|improve this question





















  • Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
    – K7AAY
    2 days ago










  • The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
    – guiverc
    2 days ago











  • Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago
















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was banging my head not being able to install mariadb and python3-pip in a minimal install of Ubuntu 18.04. Every web search showed pages with the expected apt install package commands. When I installed a desktop version, I see sources.list under /etc/apt has far more lines with desktop than minimal.



Why would these be different for apt sources? I did plain vanilla choices on both.



Desktop Install:



-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2904 Aug 3 15:46 sources.list


Minimal Install:



-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 164 Aug 1 21:13 sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jul 25 23:04 sources.list.curtin.old


I can't post examples since I don't have enough reputation points due to links.







share|improve this question





















  • Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
    – K7AAY
    2 days ago










  • The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
    – guiverc
    2 days ago











  • Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I was banging my head not being able to install mariadb and python3-pip in a minimal install of Ubuntu 18.04. Every web search showed pages with the expected apt install package commands. When I installed a desktop version, I see sources.list under /etc/apt has far more lines with desktop than minimal.



Why would these be different for apt sources? I did plain vanilla choices on both.



Desktop Install:



-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2904 Aug 3 15:46 sources.list


Minimal Install:



-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 164 Aug 1 21:13 sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jul 25 23:04 sources.list.curtin.old


I can't post examples since I don't have enough reputation points due to links.







share|improve this question













I was banging my head not being able to install mariadb and python3-pip in a minimal install of Ubuntu 18.04. Every web search showed pages with the expected apt install package commands. When I installed a desktop version, I see sources.list under /etc/apt has far more lines with desktop than minimal.



Why would these be different for apt sources? I did plain vanilla choices on both.



Desktop Install:



-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2904 Aug 3 15:46 sources.list


Minimal Install:



-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 164 Aug 1 21:13 sources.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jul 25 23:04 sources.list.curtin.old


I can't post examples since I don't have enough reputation points due to links.









share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









K7AAY

3,56721443




3,56721443









asked 2 days ago









Benjamin Baez

1




1











  • Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
    – K7AAY
    2 days ago










  • The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
    – guiverc
    2 days ago











  • Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago
















  • Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
    – K7AAY
    2 days ago










  • The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
    – guiverc
    2 days ago











  • Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    2 days ago















Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
– K7AAY
2 days ago




Suggest, if you have screenshots, to copy them up to imgur.com/upload and then click on edit above and add the link(s) to the screenshot.
– K7AAY
2 days ago












The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
– guiverc
2 days ago





The minimal install looks too small; so I'm betting the comments & instructions have been removed (in order to make it minimal). I suspect if you were to remove all comments, then diff them, they may be identical (but you'd have to to diff a grep of the files to confirm..)
– guiverc
2 days ago













Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
2 days ago




Why would they be different is up to the people who actually worked on the minimal version. Perhaps their reasoning is that minimal Ubuntu needs only packages in main repository only, while desktop needs a few in other repositories, hence the difference in amount of lines in these two text files. guiverc also properly noted the overhead of comments. But overall why they're different by default is up to people who work on each respective version of Ubuntu
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
2 days ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1062167%2fwhy-is-the-apt-sources-different-between-a-minimal-and-desktop-install%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1062167%2fwhy-is-the-apt-sources-different-between-a-minimal-and-desktop-install%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

pylint3 and pip3 broken

Missing snmpget and snmpwalk

How to enroll fingerprints to Ubuntu 17.10 with VFS491